LegalBeagle
Senior Member
Dear Homie..
Being lazy and asking my wise experienced friend than search for the answers myself..
A friend of mine has discovered water damage on his sub flooring and also the main beam that sits on top of the concrete blocks (parallel to rear wall). It appears that the deck was built the same level as the rear door and attached to the house without flashing (I think we can assume that there is no permit for this work). This was done by the previous owner.
A house inspection prior to closing (18 months ago, home is in VA) found minor rot on a beam in the same area. This was fixed by the previous owner (new support added).
The questions:
1. After 18 months, does he have any recourse against the previous owner for lack of a permit?
2. Does he have any recourse against the home inspection company for failing to point out the lack of flashing considering the deck is attached directly to the home?
3. Is the lack of flashing even a consideration during a home inspection?
Thanks dude..
LB.
Being lazy and asking my wise experienced friend than search for the answers myself..
A friend of mine has discovered water damage on his sub flooring and also the main beam that sits on top of the concrete blocks (parallel to rear wall). It appears that the deck was built the same level as the rear door and attached to the house without flashing (I think we can assume that there is no permit for this work). This was done by the previous owner.
A house inspection prior to closing (18 months ago, home is in VA) found minor rot on a beam in the same area. This was fixed by the previous owner (new support added).
The questions:
1. After 18 months, does he have any recourse against the previous owner for lack of a permit?
2. Does he have any recourse against the home inspection company for failing to point out the lack of flashing considering the deck is attached directly to the home?
3. Is the lack of flashing even a consideration during a home inspection?
Thanks dude..
LB.