ashwinganesan
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? WI
I posted earlier, on 26-April-2009, at misc.legal with the subject
"agent(s) refusing to disclose identities to be held
accountable".
Just to add to my previous posting, below are further details from the
previous emails and letters I sent out to people in Madison about the
unresolved illegal activities that have negative impact on me.
My pursuit on this front at Madison, WI, USA during 2007-2008 led to
no positive resolutions. The main problem is: how do I get the court
case started when I don't know the identities of the monitoring
persons or agency (see my previous posting), so that I can testify.
At present their main agenda is to prevent my court case against them
(my previous posting describes the charges) and my testimonies to the
truth, and I have received threats on this. While they might have
official reasons for monitoring me which they use to justify the
monitoring to other people, I believe the real/actual/unofficial
agendas for monitoring me are different, and it is clear that illegal
activities have taken place. I moved to Mumbai, India a few months
ago.
To go back to the beginning, due to indications I have received from
various folks, I speculated I was being monitored for certain agendas.
I tried to have these illegative activities addressed, starting in
early 2007. One of these activities was the repeated interference by
the monitoring person(s) with the various people I meet, and sharing
various (technical) details obtained from monitoring me to the people
I meet, for certain negative agendas. Their interferences with the
people I meet, behind my back, unacknowledged to me, was an abusive
experience because the dissonance (between what people I meet should
know about me, and what I sense they know about me, which is sometimes
more) did not get admitted or explained to me. (I now believe that
there is probably a law on confidentiality of monitoring, whereby
people who know I am being monitored are not allowed legally to admit
it to me. Thus, a consequence of their agendas being implemented was
that an abusive and unhealthy environment was effected automatically,
by force, using the confidentiality law.)
SOME LAW ON CONFIDENTIALITY OF MONITORING:
The monitoring person(s), responsible for serious convictions,
successfully prevented my complaints from being addressed. On
hindsight, I now believe that the law on confidentiality of monitoring
has prevented people from acknowledging or addressing my complaint.
Furthermore, I believe that the monitoring persons used misinformation
obtained from monitoring me to make false/serious accusations, another
aspect that led to obstruction of justice on my complaint, behind my
back. I did not know, while I was in Madison, that false accusations
were made on persons who did not even play such a role, say among the
top 10 persons who helped me form my beliefs on the surveillance
methods and their agendas. The whole time I pursued justice during
2007-2008, I did not know there was any legal issue at all, other than
the one where the agents needed to defend themselves from me, should I
choose to pursue legal recourse - it did not occur to me that the
_agents could be accusing other people_. I now speculate that they
controlled my environment and perceptions not just for career-related
perceptions, but also so I don't find out about this legal issue and
address it immediately (which they could have obviously done easily
and any time by just contacting me, but then their interferences would
have been exposed to me, making it possible for me to recover sooner
from the abusive experiences). I believe their method of operation
was as follows:
--They have the resources and jurisdiction to move on a much faster
time-scale than people normally do, so when I decided to pursue having
my complaint addressed, they immediately accused some persons (by
exaggerating my personal or informal comments, behind my back, putting
them on the defense on serious charges). These persons are then
coerced into covering up the matter rather than helping me. Note their
continued use of surveillance methods to help determine that I started
pursuing a complaint and then to set up barriers pre-emptively to
prevent the complaint from being addressed.
--It is possible these persons denied the accusations, but the agents
never contacted me to investigate my comments further, and one needs
to have at least a little evidence before (legally) prosecuting for
serious convictions, especially if I am being fully monitored. (And
such evidence on violating the confidentiality law does not exist.)
I would have been willing to make legal testimonies to the truth, and
that would have resolved the legal issue by vindicating these persons,
but then their interferences and negative agendas would have also been
exposed to me, putting a stop to their agendas and helping me recover
from the abusive experiences and get back on track with my research
work and career, and any court cases would be those where the agent(s)
get prosecuted.
--Thus the issue of addressing my complaints just gets stalled, and
they become successful in further implementing their agendas. This
results in obstruction of justice because _they don't want to be
prosecuted first_ and _they wanted to continue implementing their
agendas_, so they act fast, that too behind my back, so that the
resolution of any false accusations (which they want to be the first
step) does not occur. And people probably don't want to defend
themselves against powers-that-be on false accusations that might be
serious charges, especially if they are misinformed by the agent(s).
THIS MEANS THEY CONTINUED TO SCREW ME OVER DOUBLY
If my speculation is true that the agent(s) made any such false
accusations, they need to be held accountable, not just on my initial
complaints, but also for the further damage to my life and career
resulting from their accusations. They were so out to get me,
especially on my (not making any) intellectual contributions: after
they inflicted abusive experiences, got me to obsess over the
monitoring, and succeeded in hindering my progress on research because
_none of the accused persons helped me_ address the monitoring
problems, I am guessing _they actually accused people of helping_
expose the monitoring or their agendas to me in serious ways, _which
enabled them to continue orchestrating their agendas more severely_.
They have been very effective in sabotage during the first two years
(they wasted my time because none of the accused person(s) or others I
might have written about helped me understand or address the
monitoring problems), and then in continued sabotage during the third
year (they wasted more of my time, since I pursued justice and kept
wondering why it was denied, in addition to the continued abusive
experiences and other agendas).
During those three years, they simultaneously tried to convince me
(through various folks) that I am crazy for thinking I am being
monitored, while also accusing others of violating the confidentiality
laws. These contradictory agendas reveal their intent again. If such
confidentiality laws were violated, they should have given up on
trying to convince me I am crazy or continuing to implement other
agendas. The abusive experiences and lack of explicit acknowledgement
of monitoring continued throughout.
Note that the above details mostly refer to (what I believe to be) the
second orchestration designed to prevent me from stopping the problems
in my initial complaint from continuing or being addressed and
resolved.
Ashwin Ganesan.
-------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ashwin Ganesan"
Subject: Re: unresolved problems
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:48:45 -0500
Just to let you know - I have not received any response at all to
my emails or letters these past couple months (other than one
student asking me if I want her to do anything with my letter, and
one professor wishing me a new year), though I have been checking
the given <email> account regularly. The monitoring
individual(s) have not introduced themselves to me so far. So
there has been a lack of accountability on the illegal activities
that have taken place since 2005 due to their involvement and
orchestration, despite the negative, long-term impact it has had
on me.
Ashwin.What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
I posted earlier, on 26-April-2009, at misc.legal with the subject
"agent(s) refusing to disclose identities to be held
accountable".
Just to add to my previous posting, below are further details from the
previous emails and letters I sent out to people in Madison about the
unresolved illegal activities that have negative impact on me.
My pursuit on this front at Madison, WI, USA during 2007-2008 led to
no positive resolutions. The main problem is: how do I get the court
case started when I don't know the identities of the monitoring
persons or agency (see my previous posting), so that I can testify.
At present their main agenda is to prevent my court case against them
(my previous posting describes the charges) and my testimonies to the
truth, and I have received threats on this. While they might have
official reasons for monitoring me which they use to justify the
monitoring to other people, I believe the real/actual/unofficial
agendas for monitoring me are different, and it is clear that illegal
activities have taken place. I moved to Mumbai, India a few months
ago.
To go back to the beginning, due to indications I have received from
various folks, I speculated I was being monitored for certain agendas.
I tried to have these illegative activities addressed, starting in
early 2007. One of these activities was the repeated interference by
the monitoring person(s) with the various people I meet, and sharing
various (technical) details obtained from monitoring me to the people
I meet, for certain negative agendas. Their interferences with the
people I meet, behind my back, unacknowledged to me, was an abusive
experience because the dissonance (between what people I meet should
know about me, and what I sense they know about me, which is sometimes
more) did not get admitted or explained to me. (I now believe that
there is probably a law on confidentiality of monitoring, whereby
people who know I am being monitored are not allowed legally to admit
it to me. Thus, a consequence of their agendas being implemented was
that an abusive and unhealthy environment was effected automatically,
by force, using the confidentiality law.)
SOME LAW ON CONFIDENTIALITY OF MONITORING:
The monitoring person(s), responsible for serious convictions,
successfully prevented my complaints from being addressed. On
hindsight, I now believe that the law on confidentiality of monitoring
has prevented people from acknowledging or addressing my complaint.
Furthermore, I believe that the monitoring persons used misinformation
obtained from monitoring me to make false/serious accusations, another
aspect that led to obstruction of justice on my complaint, behind my
back. I did not know, while I was in Madison, that false accusations
were made on persons who did not even play such a role, say among the
top 10 persons who helped me form my beliefs on the surveillance
methods and their agendas. The whole time I pursued justice during
2007-2008, I did not know there was any legal issue at all, other than
the one where the agents needed to defend themselves from me, should I
choose to pursue legal recourse - it did not occur to me that the
_agents could be accusing other people_. I now speculate that they
controlled my environment and perceptions not just for career-related
perceptions, but also so I don't find out about this legal issue and
address it immediately (which they could have obviously done easily
and any time by just contacting me, but then their interferences would
have been exposed to me, making it possible for me to recover sooner
from the abusive experiences). I believe their method of operation
was as follows:
--They have the resources and jurisdiction to move on a much faster
time-scale than people normally do, so when I decided to pursue having
my complaint addressed, they immediately accused some persons (by
exaggerating my personal or informal comments, behind my back, putting
them on the defense on serious charges). These persons are then
coerced into covering up the matter rather than helping me. Note their
continued use of surveillance methods to help determine that I started
pursuing a complaint and then to set up barriers pre-emptively to
prevent the complaint from being addressed.
--It is possible these persons denied the accusations, but the agents
never contacted me to investigate my comments further, and one needs
to have at least a little evidence before (legally) prosecuting for
serious convictions, especially if I am being fully monitored. (And
such evidence on violating the confidentiality law does not exist.)
I would have been willing to make legal testimonies to the truth, and
that would have resolved the legal issue by vindicating these persons,
but then their interferences and negative agendas would have also been
exposed to me, putting a stop to their agendas and helping me recover
from the abusive experiences and get back on track with my research
work and career, and any court cases would be those where the agent(s)
get prosecuted.
--Thus the issue of addressing my complaints just gets stalled, and
they become successful in further implementing their agendas. This
results in obstruction of justice because _they don't want to be
prosecuted first_ and _they wanted to continue implementing their
agendas_, so they act fast, that too behind my back, so that the
resolution of any false accusations (which they want to be the first
step) does not occur. And people probably don't want to defend
themselves against powers-that-be on false accusations that might be
serious charges, especially if they are misinformed by the agent(s).
THIS MEANS THEY CONTINUED TO SCREW ME OVER DOUBLY
If my speculation is true that the agent(s) made any such false
accusations, they need to be held accountable, not just on my initial
complaints, but also for the further damage to my life and career
resulting from their accusations. They were so out to get me,
especially on my (not making any) intellectual contributions: after
they inflicted abusive experiences, got me to obsess over the
monitoring, and succeeded in hindering my progress on research because
_none of the accused persons helped me_ address the monitoring
problems, I am guessing _they actually accused people of helping_
expose the monitoring or their agendas to me in serious ways, _which
enabled them to continue orchestrating their agendas more severely_.
They have been very effective in sabotage during the first two years
(they wasted my time because none of the accused person(s) or others I
might have written about helped me understand or address the
monitoring problems), and then in continued sabotage during the third
year (they wasted more of my time, since I pursued justice and kept
wondering why it was denied, in addition to the continued abusive
experiences and other agendas).
During those three years, they simultaneously tried to convince me
(through various folks) that I am crazy for thinking I am being
monitored, while also accusing others of violating the confidentiality
laws. These contradictory agendas reveal their intent again. If such
confidentiality laws were violated, they should have given up on
trying to convince me I am crazy or continuing to implement other
agendas. The abusive experiences and lack of explicit acknowledgement
of monitoring continued throughout.
Note that the above details mostly refer to (what I believe to be) the
second orchestration designed to prevent me from stopping the problems
in my initial complaint from continuing or being addressed and
resolved.
Ashwin Ganesan.
-------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ashwin Ganesan"
Subject: Re: unresolved problems
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:48:45 -0500
Just to let you know - I have not received any response at all to
my emails or letters these past couple months (other than one
student asking me if I want her to do anything with my letter, and
one professor wishing me a new year), though I have been checking
the given <email> account regularly. The monitoring
individual(s) have not introduced themselves to me so far. So
there has been a lack of accountability on the illegal activities
that have taken place since 2005 due to their involvement and
orchestration, despite the negative, long-term impact it has had
on me.
Ashwin.What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
