Iowa
who is liable if a city that does require building permits for property development does not follow general procedure in the case of one well conected individual? The redevelopment has serious adverse effects to my adjioning property. The property was purchsed from the Mayor. According to Ch. 11 the legislative guide book the mayor should have no more involvement in it, which he has. The permit has not been sizned by the builder. According to the Mayor's/sellers statement before he aware the builder/friend / purchaser of the property had not sign the permit. The liability is with the builder upon signing the permit. General procedure also requires the building administrator to approve the redevelopment after the work is finished by signing his name and approval date. In this case I requested the B.A. to come to the site and see haw the redeveloper trucked in massive amounts of fill dirt, Do to the oversized structures he buildt on an undersized lot he changed the frontage of his home to face the alley and regraded the entire lot, rediorected the roof surfaces and guttering all onto my property. My foundation has suffered damage. My lot floods with minimal amounts of rainfall.
I information I have found in the no adverse floodplains manual tells that as the adjoining property owner my duty is to bring this problem to the attention of the Building Administrator, which I did. He said without hesitation that he did not intent to address my issues. The Federal Stormwater Regulations and the Adverse Floodplains management manual both say most lawyereswill take this type case on a contingency fee as courts always award high monetary dmages. The County Attorney wrote me a statement that he "frankly does not care". These individuals are all blood related or close working colleagues. I have no way to resolve my situation in Lee County. There has also been fraud and pergury commited but they will not allow me to file a complaint of any kind. There is much more to this story that is as described by the EPA Cheif as unbelivable and unpresedented. I have found a presedent case not to this degree that the plaintiff was awarded 500,000. for the nuisance drainage issue.
sincerely in need of lawyer on contingency basis,
Melody Boatner
who is liable if a city that does require building permits for property development does not follow general procedure in the case of one well conected individual? The redevelopment has serious adverse effects to my adjioning property. The property was purchsed from the Mayor. According to Ch. 11 the legislative guide book the mayor should have no more involvement in it, which he has. The permit has not been sizned by the builder. According to the Mayor's/sellers statement before he aware the builder/friend / purchaser of the property had not sign the permit. The liability is with the builder upon signing the permit. General procedure also requires the building administrator to approve the redevelopment after the work is finished by signing his name and approval date. In this case I requested the B.A. to come to the site and see haw the redeveloper trucked in massive amounts of fill dirt, Do to the oversized structures he buildt on an undersized lot he changed the frontage of his home to face the alley and regraded the entire lot, rediorected the roof surfaces and guttering all onto my property. My foundation has suffered damage. My lot floods with minimal amounts of rainfall.
I information I have found in the no adverse floodplains manual tells that as the adjoining property owner my duty is to bring this problem to the attention of the Building Administrator, which I did. He said without hesitation that he did not intent to address my issues. The Federal Stormwater Regulations and the Adverse Floodplains management manual both say most lawyereswill take this type case on a contingency fee as courts always award high monetary dmages. The County Attorney wrote me a statement that he "frankly does not care". These individuals are all blood related or close working colleagues. I have no way to resolve my situation in Lee County. There has also been fraud and pergury commited but they will not allow me to file a complaint of any kind. There is much more to this story that is as described by the EPA Cheif as unbelivable and unpresedented. I have found a presedent case not to this degree that the plaintiff was awarded 500,000. for the nuisance drainage issue.
sincerely in need of lawyer on contingency basis,
Melody Boatner