curious_cat
Junior Member
************
Last edited:
Hm. I would bet without an atty, you are even more unlikely to get somewhere in collecting that money.curious_cat said:Regardless MrsK... technically - I am owed back child support. I do not need an attorney, I do things pro-per.
pro-per?curious_cat said:Regardless MrsK... technically - I am owed back child support. I do not need an attorney, I do things pro-per.
Any one with knowledge of CA law have an answer to this?
Pro per and Pro se are both used, and me the same thing.dynomight77 said:pro-per?
is that like pro-se?
While that may be true, that does not mean that the legal question or remedy should not be accurtely addressed. We have too many people who give incorrect advice without any foundation of law or reference to statutes. When the public does a search for a question, they may only see this response.txrose1998 said:i would not answer any of this person's post.....she is conniving and manipulative and does not deserve any help.....check out her post in the custody and visitation post.....trust me, she is a waste of time....