discogram723
Member
What is the name of your state? : New York
Dear Sir/Madam:
ON JULY 27,2005 I WAS INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT WITH A COMMERCIAL VEHICLE. THERE WAS NO WITNESS AT THE SCENE WHEN THE POLICE FILED THE ACCIDENT REPORT.
THE OTHER INSURANCE COMPANY STATES THAT THEY HAVE A WITNESS AND THAT THE WITNESS HAS STATED THAT 1) I WAS ON MY CELL PHONE AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT AND 2) I RAN INTO THE COMMERCIAL VEHICLE.
THIS "WITNESS" OF THEIRS IS OBVIOUSLY LYING. FIRST OF ALL, I NEVER HAD MY CELL PHONE IN THE CAR AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT AND THE FIRST CALL THAT I MADE DIRECTLY AFTER THE ACCIDENT WAS ON ANOTHER PERSON'S CELL PHONE, SINCE I DID NOT HAVE MINES AT THE TIME(MY CELL PHONE RECORDS AND THE AUDIO 911 CALLS OF THE ACCIDENT CAN SUBSTANTIATE THIS).
THE "POINT OF IMPACT" FROM PICTURES THAT BOTH I AND ALLSTATE TOOK CLEARLY SHOW THAT THE VEHICLE RAN INTO ME (ALSO ON THE POLICE REPORT). ANY ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTIONIST WORTH THEIR SALT COULD SEE THIS.
THE OTHER INSURANCE COMPANY HAS ACTED IN "BAD FAITH" BY NOT EXAMINING THIS ACCIDENT FULLY. ALLSTATE WAS UNABLE TO RECOUP MY FATHERS(THE INSURED) DEDUCTIBLE THROUGH INTER-COMPANY ARBITRATION PARTLY DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE OTHER SIDE STATED THAT THEY HAD A WITNESS.
AT THIS POINT, IT SEEMS AS IF THE OTHER COMPANY (ST. PAUL TRAVELERS) IS CALLING ME A LIAR, WHICH IS NOT SOMETHING THAT I TAKE LIGHTLY. I WAS ALSO INJURED DURING THE ACCIDENT, WHICH FURTHER ADDS INSULT TO INJURY, IF YOU WILL.
I HAVE OBTAINED COUNSEL BUT HONESTLY FEEL THE NEED TO EXPLAIN MY SIDE TO ALL CONCERNED. IT IS ONLY THEN, I WILL TRULY FEEL VINDICATED. TAKE CARE AND GOD BLESS.
RESPECTFULLY,
RYAN C.H. LEA****What is the name of your state?
Dear Sir/Madam:
ON JULY 27,2005 I WAS INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT WITH A COMMERCIAL VEHICLE. THERE WAS NO WITNESS AT THE SCENE WHEN THE POLICE FILED THE ACCIDENT REPORT.
THE OTHER INSURANCE COMPANY STATES THAT THEY HAVE A WITNESS AND THAT THE WITNESS HAS STATED THAT 1) I WAS ON MY CELL PHONE AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT AND 2) I RAN INTO THE COMMERCIAL VEHICLE.
THIS "WITNESS" OF THEIRS IS OBVIOUSLY LYING. FIRST OF ALL, I NEVER HAD MY CELL PHONE IN THE CAR AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT AND THE FIRST CALL THAT I MADE DIRECTLY AFTER THE ACCIDENT WAS ON ANOTHER PERSON'S CELL PHONE, SINCE I DID NOT HAVE MINES AT THE TIME(MY CELL PHONE RECORDS AND THE AUDIO 911 CALLS OF THE ACCIDENT CAN SUBSTANTIATE THIS).
THE "POINT OF IMPACT" FROM PICTURES THAT BOTH I AND ALLSTATE TOOK CLEARLY SHOW THAT THE VEHICLE RAN INTO ME (ALSO ON THE POLICE REPORT). ANY ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTIONIST WORTH THEIR SALT COULD SEE THIS.
THE OTHER INSURANCE COMPANY HAS ACTED IN "BAD FAITH" BY NOT EXAMINING THIS ACCIDENT FULLY. ALLSTATE WAS UNABLE TO RECOUP MY FATHERS(THE INSURED) DEDUCTIBLE THROUGH INTER-COMPANY ARBITRATION PARTLY DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE OTHER SIDE STATED THAT THEY HAD A WITNESS.
AT THIS POINT, IT SEEMS AS IF THE OTHER COMPANY (ST. PAUL TRAVELERS) IS CALLING ME A LIAR, WHICH IS NOT SOMETHING THAT I TAKE LIGHTLY. I WAS ALSO INJURED DURING THE ACCIDENT, WHICH FURTHER ADDS INSULT TO INJURY, IF YOU WILL.
I HAVE OBTAINED COUNSEL BUT HONESTLY FEEL THE NEED TO EXPLAIN MY SIDE TO ALL CONCERNED. IT IS ONLY THEN, I WILL TRULY FEEL VINDICATED. TAKE CARE AND GOD BLESS.
RESPECTFULLY,
RYAN C.H. LEA****What is the name of your state?