• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Interesting story re: shipping a car

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Jeff in IL

Junior Member
What is the name of your state? Il

Recent event that happened to a friend. He bought a car in CA and was having it shipped to NY. The engine froze in transit (race car, no anti-freeze, we use water w/a special solution added) requiring a full engine rebuild.

The buyer claimed full responsiblity stating that he owned the car at shipment, had a full right to inspect the car and arranged for shipment and was prepared to have his engine rebuilt.

The transport company "insisted" on paying half the cost, quite unusual in today's world.

Anyway, who was actually responsible, buyer/seller/shipper. Was there any need for the transport to pony up half?
 


justalayman

Senior Member
There isn't enough info to give an accurate call.
Way too many unknowns but it sounds like the shipping company probably did not have any liability.

Who was it? There is a guy that comes to the forums that uses FEDX that would surely like to use this shipper. (just kiddiing, don't really need to know who it was. it's kind of an inside joke for those who know)
 

dallas702

Senior Member
Having shipped more than a few cars I can say that the shipper had no responsibility for the engine unless he had guaranteed the car would be kept in a climate controlled container.

Also, another reason for not using that "water wetter" crap.
 

divgradcurl

Senior Member
dallas702 said:
Having shipped more than a few cars I can say that the shipper had no responsibility for the engine unless he had guaranteed the car would be kept in a climate controlled container.

Also, another reason for not using that "water wetter" crap.
Well, crap or not, he did say the car was a race car, and I don't know of any type of racing (on asphalt or concrete, at least) these days that allows anitfreeze anymore -- they all require water wetter. Maybe street legal drags or autocross or performance driving school (where you are running street cars) may allow antifreeze, but hell, even the track days for street motorcycles require water wetter nowadays...
 

rmet4nzkx

Senior Member
divgradcurl said:
Well, crap or not, he did say the car was a race car, and I don't know of any type of racing (on asphalt or concrete, at least) these days that allows anitfreeze anymore -- they all require water wetter. Maybe street legal drags or autocross or performance driving school (where you are running street cars) may allow antifreeze, but hell, even the track days for street motorcycles require water wetter nowadays...
If that is the case then the seller should have prepared the vehicle for shipping, since it is winter and freezing many places perhaps draining the fluids would have been appropriate and then toping them off upon arrival unless it was shipped in a climate controlled carrier, in that case the shipper might be reposnsible for the cost. This is why airlines don't ship animals all year long.
 

dallas702

Senior Member
Water Wetter may be a decent substitute on the track, but it is being marketed to people as a daily driver replacement for coolant by some sellers. I've seen the lab tests and it's not a proper substitute. In fact some tests show that it does nothing more than water.

Anyway, if the car was being shipped in freezing weather it should have been drained.
 

You Are Guilty

Senior Member
I realize this is way off topic, but you're not talking about Redline Water Wetter, (the neon pink stuff), are you? Since when did that become a replacement for coolant?!
 

justalayman

Senior Member
You Are Guilty said:
I realize this is way off topic, but you're not talking about Redline Water Wetter, (the neon pink stuff), are you? Since when did that become a replacement for coolant?!
It's not a replacement. It's an additive. Water would still be the coolant base.
 

dallas702

Senior Member
Correct. I didn't mean it was being sold as a replacement for water, but as a replacement for coolant...which it is not.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top