• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Internet Web Site libel per se

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

isafakir

Junior Member
New York. I am part of a hospitality site. A visitor states in a reference that I assaulted him, that I am a paedophile, paranoid and dangerous. I have told the site administrators that none of this occured. I am 100% disabled (USA VA 100% service connected disability scholiosis and stenosis of the spine) and cannot even stand and sit down without assistance, so prime facie I did not assault him. He is not a psychiatrist. He is a full grown adult so prime facie paedophilia is out of the question, and no sexual offer or request of suggestion ever occured. If I were dangerous, how? I have no downloaded or viewed paedophilia on my computer. I am gay. Frankly the idea of paedophilia in any form is just not part of my make-up. A neighbor was present at the time of the non-occuring events. 20 some odd other guests have without exception said the accusations are absurd. I took in the person because he had been mugged and took care of him for a week until his money arrived. He broke furniture and dishes, burnt my pots, refused to make his bed or hang up his laundry to dry, or do his dishes, but he did throw dirty dishes into the trash. Ceramic and glass, not paper and plastic. When he accused me of stealing his blue jeans, I lost my patience and my anger and he left vowing revenge. The Web site specifically disclaims any involvement. Refuses so far to address the libel. The organization is incorporated in New Hampshire. I am not sure exactly but they say no one can sue as a condition of usage. But this is libel. Not usage. :confused: What can I do. It has now been viewed by thoussand of people all over the world and will have a profound effect on my profession as a teacher, as a tourist professional and as a B&B owner. The web site owners have no mechanism to review or adjuticate any kind of libelous content. Referencing as an integral part of their web site design and the libel is prominently posted in red. These are stated as facts not as opinions. Isa is a paedophile. Isa is a paranoik. Isa was aggressive to me. He is dangerous.


The exact refence as posted:

Extremely Negative

this is an advice, dont go theire isa is have a realy aggressiv behavior with a pedophilie problem also paranoiak and could be dangerous. its serious


I am a paid up member. I am an "ambassador" of the web site. I am not merely just a user. I have hosted dozens of people and all of them without exception have posted extremely positive, glowing references.
 
Last edited:


jazzminderas

Junior Member
Isn't it obvious...

Don't you find it strange how little attention your post has gotten? I think you have a case and if you hire a lawyer they can request an IP address from the website and nail the post down to your buddy. Take action, your career is on the line. I hope you get the help you need and kudos for the signature. This man is wrong and once you start some legal action he'll began to tremble.
 

stephenk

Senior Member
"Extremely Negative

this is an advice, dont go theire isa is have a realy aggressiv behavior with a pedophilie problem also paranoiak and could be dangerous. its serious"

Since the poster is illiterate, I doubt anyone has taken the post seriously. Has anyone approached you or the organization you are a member of and said they believe the claim against you?

Since nothing happened between you and the poster, why do you believe the poster psted the negative information?
 

jazzminderas

Junior Member
Irrelavent

That's funny because I thought that was irrelevant. It isn't his job to find a motive on the other persons behalf, and even so, isn't it obvious that the other person is posting negative information because he is gay and it's a cheap shot to say he is a pedophile?! Anyway I don't think the original poster needs to be interrogated but since that seems to be the aim on this site....
Like I said... get a lawyer and I think you have a case. As to why this person is badmouthing you, it's completely obvious and I hope you can take it to court because you don't deserve to loose business over something you didn't do, if you in fact did not do what he is saying you've done. I hope justice is carried out.
 

stephenk

Senior Member
"isn't it obvious that the other person is posting negative information because he is gay "

No it isn't obvious. So if the poster of this thread returns and views your post claiming he is gay, and he isn't, do you admit you committed libel?
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top