Exactly. She has model looks, the super pale skin, cornsilk curls, and light blue eyes. Her personality is incredible, and I speak withut bias. I have been around many children, and none have been as amazing as her. I believe they have had people request to adopt her. And there is a government website that talks about how much money states get for adopting children out of CPS. But children in CPS still have family fighting for them! Children in adoption agencies do not. The judge hearing the trial advocates adopting children out of the San Joaquin County CPS system.
We are going to get this psychologist removed from the case. He can't claim to be impartial if we file a complaint with the California Board of Psychology now, can he? We're reporting him for not only making a diagnosis he isn't even qualified to make based on my bf's ex's word, but also that he accepted additional money from the ex, which is actually documented in court papers. And we are also going to take him to small claims to cover the additional costs of the proper doctors to show that my bf is not bipolar and not a drug user, and also punitive for basing his diagnosis on the word of the other parent. Even if the small claims judge calls it frivolous, the point still stands that he can't claim impartiality since it wuld stand that he would obviously hold a biased view.
We are also filing a couple of CCP 170.1(a)(6)(C) reports on the judges who have broken his constitutional rights and the law.
The child has been with CPS on and off since December of 2002, and each time she was taken it was from the mother, with the exception of the last time when the mother filed a false police report, which has already been proven false. The same judge that gave us emergency custody overturned it 8 hours later in the middle of the night and moved the case from family court back to juvenile court.
Of course it doesn't help that his dad is now saying he's a bad parent. He's trying to extort my bf's trust from him, even though he can't legally touch the rest for another 5 years (what he was allowed to take out he already spent on legal bills, all $35,000 of it). The dad sent this in an e-mail several times, each of which was sent to the attorney, printed, and still saved in his e-mail. So the dad's word means Jack in court, but the psychologist, even after reading the e-mails and the dad not denying it, is using it against my bf. The dad said today that he's going to recommend that the child be adopted unless he gets the money.
Hopefully this will all work. Otherwise the system will place her back where she has been hurt. We're trying to get ahold of the media now. It can't hurt at this point. We want to expose the whole system for the corrupt piece of **** it is.