nextwife said:What is NOT legal is an owner failing to disclose knowledge of any prior mortgages that they have executed when they close on additional mortgages. In other words, the mortgage companies are allowed to have junior mortgage,. but an owner must disclose if, for example, they have recently closed on a mortgage that may go of record in front of their mortgage. That is because they are underwriting their "risk", and therefore their interest rate, based upon what priority their mortgage will have.
In counties like mine, the "recording gap" can easily run 6 weeks from the date a document is recieved at the RODs office until the date it can be picked up as "posted into the record" by a search done by the title company. I merely pointed this out because I have discovered that some people think if it does not show on the title search, they, the owner, have no responsibility to point out they closed on another mortgage a week ago, one that the title company's search would not disclose. One that does not show up on the commitment the title company has issued on behalf of the mortgage lender.seniorjudge said:You are correct...that's why we have title companies.
nextwife said:In counties like mine, the "recording gap" can easily run 6 weeks from the date a document is recieved at the RODs office until the date it can be picked up as "posted into the record" by a search done by the title company. ...
**A; so why are you asking?tweed said:What is the name of your state? Virginia
Is it legal for three different mortgage companies to simultaneously possess (noteholders) deeds of trust against the same house?