I can't get my original message to post due to some error. Here is my post:
Washington
Is it possible for a tenant to fight a landlord who is charging for damages that the tenant disputes? Or do the courts automatically favor the landlord?
I just got a letter from a collections company, and apparently my former landlord charged us several hundred dollars, mostly for preexisting wear and tear. What would it look like if I fought this? My landlord never gave us the opportunity to make a list of preexisting damages and nobody who works for that company ever set foot in the apartment before we lived there. So it is my word against nothing. Also, they told us they were remodeling the apartment anyway, so even if we had caused damages, it would have cost them nothing extra.
It is a common problem that everybody faces, but I've never heard a good answer about it. You often hear people say, "If there is preexisting damage, then take a picture of it." That sounds ridiculous to me. A photo doesn't prove anything; I could have kicked a hole in the wall and then taken a picture of it.
Thanks for any thoughts any body has. I'm thinking about paying the collections but then taking the landlord to small claims court. I'm also curious about how this stuff works in general. Although, hopefully I won't be renting for that much longer!