• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Is there anything we can do from here?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

kitt

Junior Member
What is the name of your state? PA

Here is a brief history. A year ago my husband's ex took him to court for more CS. He was ordered to pay $1200.00 mo for (3) children to his ex. We have 50/50 custody of the children. They live with us exactly the same amount of time as they do with his ex. His support amount was set based on the fact the she claimed she was unable to work due to suffering from panic attacks and anxiety. We did not get a deviated amount based on the 50/50 custody based on this issue. The judge at that time gave his ex 12 months to get herself healthy. After the 12 month time period if she was still unable to work she would have to prove in court at her expense that she was still unable to work. In this time period his ex quit going to her therapy sessions, went off of her medication due to becoming pregnant and has been turned down by social security. She was also "well" enough to help coach her daughters cheerleading squad and participate in dart leagues where she won an MVP award. Fastforward to now, she is still claiming she is unable to work due to these conditions. We are as always back in court over the money issue to get her an earning capacity assigned, but does anyone know if it would be worth our while to try to get temporary custody for her to get herself "well" as the judge ordered her to a year ago? There is now a new judge handeling the case. If so, in what direction should we go? I know these are real issues and have been trying to do research on them but am finding it hard to find any really helpful sites on these conditions. Would we be able to argue that if she isn't well enough to do any kind of work - for example, work in a daycare - then she should not be able to take care of 5 children (the three she has with my husband, the new baby, and her boyfriends daughter from a previouse relationship that lives with her five days a week.) in her home without having her panic attacks and anxiety under control? Does anyone know where there may be any kind of literature or even any existing cases that I could look at to research a situation like this? We are wondering if it would be in the kids best interest to try for full temporary custody until she got herself healthy enough to hold down a job and then go back to the 50/50 custody that is in place now. The way things are right now we seem to be supporting the kids 150% and her 0. The kids are the ones losing out and if there really is something wrong with her it would be in all parties best interest for her to get healty. Does anyone have any idea of how a judge will look at how she went about her life the past year without getting the help she needed and they may just give her an earning capacity and if so should we leave it go at that if support gets modified? Thank you for any advice you may have.
 


BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
kitt said:
What is the name of your state? PA

Here is a brief history. A year ago my husband's ex took him to court for more CS. He was ordered to pay $1200.00 mo for (3) children to his ex. We have 50/50 custody of the children. They live with us exactly the same amount of time as they do with his ex. His support amount was set based on the fact the she claimed she was unable to work due to suffering from panic attacks and anxiety. We did not get a deviated amount based on the 50/50 custody based on this issue. The judge at that time gave his ex 12 months to get herself healthy. After the 12 month time period if she was still unable to work she would have to prove in court at her expense that she was still unable to work. In this time period his ex quit going to her therapy sessions, went off of her medication due to becoming pregnant and has been turned down by social security. She was also "well" enough to help coach her daughters cheerleading squad and participate in dart leagues where she won an MVP award. Fastforward to now, she is still claiming she is unable to work due to these conditions. We are as always back in court over the money issue to get her an earning capacity assigned, but does anyone know if it would be worth our while to try to get temporary custody for her to get herself "well" as the judge ordered her to a year ago? There is now a new judge handeling the case. If so, in what direction should we go? I know these are real issues and have been trying to do research on them but am finding it hard to find any really helpful sites on these conditions. Would we be able to argue that if she isn't well enough to do any kind of work - for example, work in a daycare - then she should not be able to take care of 5 children (the three she has with my husband, the new baby, and her boyfriends daughter from a previouse relationship that lives with her five days a week.) in her home without having her panic attacks and anxiety under control? Does anyone know where there may be any kind of literature or even any existing cases that I could look at to research a situation like this? We are wondering if it would be in the kids best interest to try for full temporary custody until she got herself healthy enough to hold down a job and then go back to the 50/50 custody that is in place now. The way things are right now we seem to be supporting the kids 150% and her 0. The kids are the ones losing out and if there really is something wrong with her it would be in all parties best interest for her to get healty. Does anyone have any idea of how a judge will look at how she went about her life the past year without getting the help she needed and they may just give her an earning capacity and if so should we leave it go at that if support gets modified? Thank you for any advice you may have.
Go back over you post and take out one word that keeps showing up and then I MAY answer you. Here's a hint: It's the one word that a judge will tell you to stop saying or leave the courtroom.
 

moburkes

Senior Member
BelizeBreeze said:
Go back over you post and take out one word that keeps showing up and then I MAY answer you. Here's a hint: It's the one word that a judge will tell you to stop saying or leave the courtroom.
Does it have to do with "WE"?
 

moburkes

Senior Member
fairisfair said:
ho ho, too slow ;) :D
Dang!:mad: I was too busy shoving the popcorn I burnt into my mouth. Don't I get a "pass" for eating burnt popcorn? At work? Where every one around me is mad, 'cause I made it stinky in here?
 

fairisfair

Senior Member
moburkes said:
Dang!:mad: I was too busy shoving the popcorn I burnt into my mouth. Don't I get a "pass" for eating burnt popcorn? At work? Where every one around me is mad, 'cause I made it stinky in here?
Ew! yes, anyone who can eat burned popcorn deserves an award!
 

kitt

Junior Member
I apologize for using the word "we". I do understand that as the kids step parent I have no legal rights, but I do consider all of us a family and that is where the we comes from. I am not a step parent that oversteps my boundaries. I don't even go to court with my husband as I know I have no legal rights to any of it and any issues between my husband and his ex concerning the kids is between the two of them. Yes, I am trying to help him in any way I can and I don't know much about the legal systems as nothing seems to work the way I think would be the logical way - so I guess it's in his best interest that I DO keep my nose out of things. I am just trying to do some research and see if there is even any grounds for what he is looking at doing. I had read another post on here about the ADA and a sort of similar situation as someone was wanting to take away a NCP visitation due to being bi-polar and thought someone might be able to help in this situation. Basically to see how this will be looked upon in court and if she does actually have any of these conditions and if not how does he go about proving there really is nothing the matter with her.
 

fairisfair

Senior Member
kitt said:
I apologize for using the word "we". I do understand that as the kids step parent I have no legal rights, but I do consider all of us a family and that is where the we comes from. I am not a step parent that oversteps my boundaries. I don't even go to court with my husband as I know I have no legal rights to any of it and any issues between my husband and his ex concerning the kids is between the two of them. Yes, I am trying to help him in any way I can and I don't know much about the legal systems as nothing seems to work the way I think would be the logical way - so I guess it's in his best interest that I DO keep my nose out of things. I am just trying to do some research and see if there is even any grounds for what he is looking at doing. I had read another post on here about the ADA and a sort of similar situation as someone was wanting to take away a NCP visitation due to being bi-polar and thought someone might be able to help in this situation. Basically to see how this will be looked upon in court and if she does actually have any of these conditions and if not how does he go about proving there really is nothing the matter with her.
um.... if it was me, and I wanted an answer, I would do as BB suggested, retype the post, leaving out the word we. Be factual and not emotional, you will get the answers you are looking for,(well maybe not the ones you are looking for, but the correct answers anyway) if you follow the rules.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top