What is the name of your state? Mississippi
A corporation has a loan which is secured by property owned by the corporation as well as some property owned by a 3rd party. An agreement was signed by the 3rd party at the time the loan was made giving permission for this property to be assigned as collateral. The 3rd party did not co-sign or personally guarantee the loan other than to allow this particular property to be put up as additional collateral. Does the bank officer have total freedom to discuss any and all aspects of this loan at any time with the 3rd party (owner of the collateral) without any formal agreement by the actual parties of the loan, the corporate officers who are personal guarantors of the loan? Just checking, cause it really gets on my nerves when he calls the 3rd party first about something before calling me, president of the corporation! I realize I just may be touchy but thought it wouldn't hurt to see if I have a right to call him on it.
A corporation has a loan which is secured by property owned by the corporation as well as some property owned by a 3rd party. An agreement was signed by the 3rd party at the time the loan was made giving permission for this property to be assigned as collateral. The 3rd party did not co-sign or personally guarantee the loan other than to allow this particular property to be put up as additional collateral. Does the bank officer have total freedom to discuss any and all aspects of this loan at any time with the 3rd party (owner of the collateral) without any formal agreement by the actual parties of the loan, the corporate officers who are personal guarantors of the loan? Just checking, cause it really gets on my nerves when he calls the 3rd party first about something before calling me, president of the corporation! I realize I just may be touchy but thought it wouldn't hurt to see if I have a right to call him on it.