FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
If evidence of a material error in the order clearly appears in the court record, then the appropriate motion IS NOT to reconsider, but for an order "nunc pro tunc"; literally (Latin) = "now for then".
Unfortunately if you failed to bring up the $600 you were voluntarily paying earlier and there was nothing said by mom either ...then the judge never could factor it in....and in some forums ..a voluntary payment is considered a gift...you may have lost that credit window...you can try to get it factored back in, would help if you have some paper trail / proof ...but don't bet the ranch on prevailing.
Yes it was mentioned and I didn't bring proper proof. I spoke to an attorney today, that I will be meeting tomorrow to see if my case is worth filing an exception. The attorney said that the initial case was not a ruled by a judge but rather a magistrate. Those CS cases will take 10 days to reach the judge for the final decision. If the case is worth filing an exception then he will do so immediately...Hope that's the case. I just want to pay what's fair according to how much I make as my kids needs to be taken care of and the mom has legal physical custody.
If evidence of a material error in the order clearly appears in the court record, then the appropriate motion IS NOT to reconsider, but for an order "nunc pro tunc"; literally (Latin) = "now for then".
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.