Just a question

[dreamcatchers]

What is the name of your state? NY

I am not sure if this is the right forum to ask this, but here goes:

What does 'Deliberative process privilege' mean? I know what each word means separately, but what would this mean pertaining to law?

Thank you

 

[You Are Guilty]

Although I personally can appreciate the apathy inherent in asking others to do your homework for you, unfortunately, my rather large friend Mr. Google doesn't take kindly to it.

 

[dreamcatchers]

Although I personally can appreciate the apathy inherent in asking others to do your homework for you, unfortunately, my rather large friend Mr. Google doesn't take kindly to it.

I only asked a question. I did a search on 'Mr. Google' and it came up with an answer for each word and not an answer for the collective meaning as it would pertain to law . I'm not asking anyone to do 'homework' for me. I did find the answer to my question however, to which you obviously couldn't provide.

Thank you.

 

[You Are Guilty]

I only asked a question. I did a search on 'Mr. Google' and it came up with an answer for each word and not an answer for the collective meaning as it would pertain to law . I'm not asking anyone to do 'homework' for me. I did find the answer to my question however, to which you obviously couldn't provide.

Thank you.

Simply astounding. Now you're too lazy to even click that link, where, and I quote now (from the very first link on that page):

The state Supreme Court in Denver expressly recognized the existence of a"deliberative process" privilege in a decision in late November.

The privilege exempts from disclosure materials that reveal the mental processes of governmental officials generated prior to reaching a decision. Materials containing post-decisional analyses or that do not reveal the "give and take" of decision-making are not privileged.

I could have, I suppose, given you this link which is NY specific, but it would have required you to read an actual case (again, the first link on that page) which says:

As correctly noted by the State, high-ranking government officials enjoy a deliberative process privilege for information or documents that relate to a governmental entity's internal decision-making processes.

And thus, isn't quite as explanatory.

So, despite your inability to realize it, I did answer your question in my original response. And you apparently need some tutoring on how to seach Mr. Google, as it took me all of two seconds to get you your answer. You can use it for non-porn searches you know...


{edit} You're welcome.

 

[dreamcatchers]

can[/i] use it for non-porn searches you know...

So, tell me, oh wise one, what exactly does 'seach' mean? Or are you just going to come back with some more rhetoric dribble because you can not believe you are capable of making a minor mistake?

I realize I made a minor mistake of thinking this forum was here to answer some questions a person might have pertaining to law. I was not aware, however, this forum was here for the sole purpose of people, such as yourself, to try to degrade anyone. Then again, after reading some of the responses of the 'senior' members, I probably should have expected it. My mistake and I apologize for taking up your time.

 

[You Are Guilty]

No problem. Enjoy your continuing quest to become an intelligent member of this society. Best of luck to you.


{edit} I note you chose to focus on one typo in my response rather than the subject itself, i.e. that your answer was easily found with no special legal training needed. I did not know I was in the presence of the Great Holy Proofreader, and for that, I humble myself before You and Your vast spelling wisdom....

...on the other hand, your (lack of) knowledge of English grammar is atrocious. Let me point out a few of my personal favorites.

I did find the answer to my question however, to which you obviously couldn't provide.

Lesson #1: "Which" is not a verb. In fact, "which" is what I like to call "an adjective." So, not being a verb, your attempt, as near as I can tell, to use the infinitive with it is altogether inappropriate.

Or are you just going to come back with some more rhetoric dribble because you can not believe you are capable of making a minor mistake?

Lesson #2: "Dribble" (a verb meaning to issue sporadically and in small bits; or to let or cause to fall in drops little by little) is a completely different word than "drivel," a transitive verb meaning "to utter in an infantile or imbecilic way." Here, they are not interchangeable and so your sentence, much like your wasted life, makes no sense.

Lesson #3: People who live in glass houses...

 

[dreamcatchers]

Awwww......what's the matter? Didn't you get any last night? Or, did your batteries wear out?

 

[You Are Guilty]

Awwww......what's the matter? Didn't you get any last night? Or, did your batteries wear out?

Much better -- been staying in weekends so you can improve your writing skills? However, you still haven't seemed to grasp proper comma usage (none needed in the second sentence), and frankly, your originality is, for lack of a better word, lacking. But I guess Reading Is Fundamental, at least for you.

 

[You Are Guilty]

You are such a pompous ass. A question was asked and I believe it was sincere. All you had to offer was insults. The anonymity of the Internet gives insecure "drivel" like yourself a chance to spout off with the impunity only a coward like you would take advantage of.

And thank you for your pointed insight into this whole matter. I see all three of your supremely intelligent posts are criticisms of the people who volunteer their time here (for free, I might add), which apparently isn't good enough for you. I guess your law degree entitles you to make that determination. Oh wait! Let me guess, you don't have one, you were too busy working and saving up for that nice double-wide in Georgia, down by the river.


Cliff Note version:

A question was asked and the correct answer was given. Simply because I didn't want to waste my time playing elementary school teacher and doing someone else's homework for them, they got upset that they might actually have to learn something for themself, decided to ignore my (correct) answer and focused insteadon a typo. But, in doing so, they made a post filled with intentional errors. You then jumped in and decided you don't like the way I answer people's questions (for free - and I'm sure my paying clients are thrilled), yet you didn't offer answers to anything or anyone. You just like to voice your idiotic opinions, as if any of us with more than a sixth grade education care what moronic ramblings your two working synapses come up with.

Have a mediocre day.