Gracie3787
Senior Member
What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? Florida
An order for my husband to pay arrears was issued in June 2002. I would like some opinions as to how legal and enforceable the order is. A short version of the history:
My husband quit paying support in Aug 1999, after his oldest turned 18. Although I disagreed with him, I knew that CSE would catch up with him. They did, in April 2001 he was found in contempt, he assumed that he would be ordered to pay arrears and his then 20 yr old married daughter would be taken off CS. The judge said that she could not order arrears or modification until petitions were filed.
From April 2001 to June 2002 two modifications were done due to childrens' emancipations. CSE did not file any petition for arrears, however, his ex wrote about 25 letters to the judge asking for arrears, and filed a last minute (1 day before hearing) ex-parte "counter-petition" never serving my husband. Payment of arrears was not ordered at either hearing.
In June 2002 a hearing was held on a motion my husband filed on other issues. The judge ordered him to pay $50 per week arrears payments, although my husband's net weekly income, (after $54.60 on-going support) was only $150.00. When my husband tried to tell the judge that the payment of arrears was not the issue before the court the judge told him to be quiet and ended the hearing. (The judge retired the next day)
The day after the hearing my husband was served with the summons and petition for payment on arrears- the same petition that the judge ruled on the day before!
My husband filed a motion for rehearing on the basis of due process, motion granted order was entitled "Order Granting Rehearing of Petition for Payment On Arrears"
The judge that was supposed to hear the rehearing refused to allow my husband to speak and told him that his due process rights had not been violated. The "Order on Rehearingof Petition" states- "The Order Granting Rehearing of Petition for Payment On Arrears is hereby SET ASIDE" .
We did not have the $600 it would cost to file an appeal, so we are stuck with what I believe was, and still is, an order that was issued without notice, without making a finding of ability to pay, and without my husband being allowed to be heard. I'd appreciate any opinions/advise on this mess.
Oh, I forgot, there was a different judge for each hearing.
An order for my husband to pay arrears was issued in June 2002. I would like some opinions as to how legal and enforceable the order is. A short version of the history:
My husband quit paying support in Aug 1999, after his oldest turned 18. Although I disagreed with him, I knew that CSE would catch up with him. They did, in April 2001 he was found in contempt, he assumed that he would be ordered to pay arrears and his then 20 yr old married daughter would be taken off CS. The judge said that she could not order arrears or modification until petitions were filed.
From April 2001 to June 2002 two modifications were done due to childrens' emancipations. CSE did not file any petition for arrears, however, his ex wrote about 25 letters to the judge asking for arrears, and filed a last minute (1 day before hearing) ex-parte "counter-petition" never serving my husband. Payment of arrears was not ordered at either hearing.
In June 2002 a hearing was held on a motion my husband filed on other issues. The judge ordered him to pay $50 per week arrears payments, although my husband's net weekly income, (after $54.60 on-going support) was only $150.00. When my husband tried to tell the judge that the payment of arrears was not the issue before the court the judge told him to be quiet and ended the hearing. (The judge retired the next day)
The day after the hearing my husband was served with the summons and petition for payment on arrears- the same petition that the judge ruled on the day before!
My husband filed a motion for rehearing on the basis of due process, motion granted order was entitled "Order Granting Rehearing of Petition for Payment On Arrears"
The judge that was supposed to hear the rehearing refused to allow my husband to speak and told him that his due process rights had not been violated. The "Order on Rehearingof Petition" states- "The Order Granting Rehearing of Petition for Payment On Arrears is hereby SET ASIDE" .
We did not have the $600 it would cost to file an appeal, so we are stuck with what I believe was, and still is, an order that was issued without notice, without making a finding of ability to pay, and without my husband being allowed to be heard. I'd appreciate any opinions/advise on this mess.
Oh, I forgot, there was a different judge for each hearing.