What is the name of your state? WI
I'm just curious about this - it's not a personal situation, purely hypothetical.
Let's say I am mugged and stabbed by some crook and have to go to the hospital for treatment (and have no insurance). In court, the judge rules the attacker is liable for all my medical expenses. Even though he is ruled to pay for the bills, he doesn't have any money or a job - thus he can't pay (or can only pay a small amount).
The hospital would likely be calling me asking for payment. If I give the hospital proof that the court found the other party was liable for the bills would they go after him? Or would they still go after me?
It seems to me that if the guy wasn't paying the judgment to you, the bills would continue to rack up (late fees, interest), eventually go to collections (wreck your credit), and you'd be screwed for something that's not your fault.
Do courts rule that bills become the responsibility of the guilty party or that the guilty party has to pay YOU the cost of the bills?
I'm just curious about this - it's not a personal situation, purely hypothetical.
Let's say I am mugged and stabbed by some crook and have to go to the hospital for treatment (and have no insurance). In court, the judge rules the attacker is liable for all my medical expenses. Even though he is ruled to pay for the bills, he doesn't have any money or a job - thus he can't pay (or can only pay a small amount).
The hospital would likely be calling me asking for payment. If I give the hospital proof that the court found the other party was liable for the bills would they go after him? Or would they still go after me?
It seems to me that if the guy wasn't paying the judgment to you, the bills would continue to rack up (late fees, interest), eventually go to collections (wreck your credit), and you'd be screwed for something that's not your fault.
Do courts rule that bills become the responsibility of the guilty party or that the guilty party has to pay YOU the cost of the bills?