R
rmsbuffalo
Guest
New York State -
My father in law passed away and left a life insurance policy which he always said named my wife and her sister as beneficiaries. After he died however, we were unable to find a statement of beneficiary. The insurance company says that they have no statement of beneficiary (one girl over the phone told us that they probably lost it when they moved their office.)
They are not denying the claim, but want to pay the benefit to the deceased's estate which would make it vulnerable to outstanding creditors, which was clearly not his intention when my father in law was paying the premiums.
Is it not the insurance company's responsibility to make sure that beneficiaries are designated for the policies they sell? I can understand a problem if an assigned beneficiary dies or is missing or doesn't come forward, but for them to not have any record of beneficiary to me seems blatantly irresponsible. To accept premium payments on a life insurance policy which names no beneficiary borders fraud does it not?
Though I would assume that NYS law directs the Insurance company to pay the benefit to the estate if the beneficiary cannot be found, I would assume that the intent of this law is to prevent insurance companies from profiting from uncollected benefits. Surely the intent would not be to provide direction for irresponsible administration.
Are we obligated to prove that we ARE beneficiaries, or is it the insurance company's obligation to prove that we are NOT beneficiaries?
What recourse do we have?
JM
My father in law passed away and left a life insurance policy which he always said named my wife and her sister as beneficiaries. After he died however, we were unable to find a statement of beneficiary. The insurance company says that they have no statement of beneficiary (one girl over the phone told us that they probably lost it when they moved their office.)
They are not denying the claim, but want to pay the benefit to the deceased's estate which would make it vulnerable to outstanding creditors, which was clearly not his intention when my father in law was paying the premiums.
Is it not the insurance company's responsibility to make sure that beneficiaries are designated for the policies they sell? I can understand a problem if an assigned beneficiary dies or is missing or doesn't come forward, but for them to not have any record of beneficiary to me seems blatantly irresponsible. To accept premium payments on a life insurance policy which names no beneficiary borders fraud does it not?
Though I would assume that NYS law directs the Insurance company to pay the benefit to the estate if the beneficiary cannot be found, I would assume that the intent of this law is to prevent insurance companies from profiting from uncollected benefits. Surely the intent would not be to provide direction for irresponsible administration.
Are we obligated to prove that we ARE beneficiaries, or is it the insurance company's obligation to prove that we are NOT beneficiaries?
What recourse do we have?
JM