• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Management services agreement broken, entity owes substantial investment capital liability

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

amira672

New member
State of Arizona,

Management/Partnership services agreement broken by B-Co, pockets all revenues while A-Co eats up the expense, B-Co owes a substantial amount of cash to A-Co for breaking agreement.

A-Co began a partnership with B-Co in hopes of making B-Co's business more profitable because B-Co was in the verge of bankruptcy.

B-Co is in the business of automotive repair and collision, A-Co takes over the financial & day-to-day operations of B-Co while B-Co is conducting field estimates, sales and improving the efficiency of jobs coming into the repair shop.

1st Month: A-Co establishes an office on B-Co's rented property (B-Co owes $5500 to landlord + additional $6000 for pocketing sales from a Chevy Tahoe, will get to that later)
A-Co sets up a new CRM and automotive repair software to make estimating, invoicing, and accounting more efficient than before.
A-Co itemizes cost efficiency and utilizes where money need to be put and where it isn't needed.
A-Co and B-Co's accountants show a net loss of ($10,500) with a discrepancy <5%.
Sales was ~$17,000. A-Co demands B-Co to produce $1500/day to break even on the net. B-Co says it can do it but is yet to prove so.

2nd Month: A-Co shows revenue doubled from 1st Month with a whopping $35,000 in sales and a net profit of $2200 with both company accountants disparaging of less than 10% discrepancy on the numbers.

This is where it get weird, by the beginning of the 3rd month, B-Co gets greedy (and probably thinks it can manage itself without A-Co) and accuses A-co of witholding profit numbers from B-Co, impossible because B-Co has all bank statements and deposits that show a balance on each month's balance sheet! B-Co cuts financial ties with A-Co right at the time when A-Co paid for more than $10,000 in parts and supplies for jobs worth more than $16,000. B-Co pockets all revenues and doesn't disclose it to A-Co and asks A-Co to leave, rendering the agreement null, but B-Co cannot terminate the agreement without a 30-day written notice, which B-Co has get to provide.

A-Co goes talks with land lord and finds out information that B-Co has done this business malpractice in the past with other victims.

A-Co demands investment capital of $5600 + $10000 in credit line outstanding balance minus available balance in the account of $2200, equal roughly $13400 owed to A-Co from B-Co.

Is this fraud? Criminal? And if it is civil, how can A-Co go about to collect this amount owed from B-Co without B-Co filing for bankruptcy? Can A-Co go after the owner (individual) and collect criminal restitution?

A-Co has spoken to numerous attorneys who demand up-front cash of +$5000 and A-Co does not have the funds to hire attorneys unless they would take contingency. Very few attorneys who do contingency, A-Co has yet to find a firm.

Thank you. I appreciate you insights and expertise on the subject.
 


adjusterjack

Senior Member
Looks like naïve A let fox B into the henhouse without doing due diligence as to fox B's background.

Is this fraud?
People frequently come here and say fraud like it's some sort of magic incantation that automatically brings divine punishment down on the perpretrator, when more often than not it's a breach of contract issue (if there was a contract). An allegation of fraud requires proof of intent to defraud, nearly impossible in most cases involving business relationships, and breach of contract requires only that there was a contract and that it was breached and that there where damages from the breach. A lot of folks also mistakenly think anything sneaky, deceptive, or nefarious constitutes "fraud." FWIW, voiding a contract for fraud generally requires, among other things, a false, affirmative representation on which the other party relied in entering into the contract.

Criminal?
Probably nothing the authorities will want to get involved in but you are welcome to report it and see how it goes.

how can A-Co go about to collect this amount owed from B-Co without B-Co filing for bankruptcy?
He can't. Everybody has a legal right to file bankruptcy. Once the bankruptcy if filed A can file an adversary action alleging wrongdoing and asking that the automatic stay be lifted, allowing him to pursue legal action against B.

Can A-Co go after the owner (individual) and collect criminal restitution?
Be would have to be convicted of a crime for A to collect criminal restitution.

A-Co has spoken to numerous attorneys who demand up-front cash of +$5000 and A-Co does not have the funds to hire attorneys unless they would take contingency. Very few attorneys who do contingency, A-Co has yet to find a firm.
Yeah, that's how it goes.
 

amira672

New member
Probably nothing the authorities will want to get involved in but you are welcome to report it and see how it goes.
Can A-Co pursue other avenues, such as filing complaint to AZ Attorney General or Maricopa County district attorney's office?

Is there anywhere A-Co can research to find that such a similar case has occurred and what steps were taken?

A-Co understands this was a "bad business deal" but B-Co continues to make more victims and A-Co may have evidence of B-Co using funds contradictory to the agreement that both companies signed.

For example, if A-Co gives a loan to B-Co for the purposes of investment but B-Co, hypothetically, goes to Las Vegas and gambles all of it away, what would that be called?
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
Can A-Co pursue other avenues, such as filing complaint to AZ Attorney General or Maricopa County district attorney's office?

Is there anywhere A-Co can research to find that such a similar case has occurred and what steps were taken?

A-Co understands this was a "bad business deal" but B-Co continues to make more victims and A-Co may have evidence of B-Co using funds contradictory to the agreement that both companies signed.
That's the very definition of a breach of contract.

For example, if A-Co gives a loan to B-Co for the purposes of investment but B-Co, hypothetically, goes to Las Vegas and gambles all of it away, what would that be called?
Hypothetically, company B could decide that life would be much better on Mars and leave...never to be seen again. (Hypotheticals are irrelevant to your matter. Company B didn't decide to gamble it all away in Vegas.)
 

Litigator22

Active Member
There is no actionable fraud present here! Not even a glimmer. If A has any recourse against B, it would be within the language of this so-called "Management/Partnership Service Agreement".

But if the same fools that managed to put the company on the line for $16K, yet allowed B to control the coffers and only learned of B's similar business shenanigans after the cat was out of the bag are responsible for the drafting of that agreement, hope is slim!

A stronger argument might be made favoring a stockholders' derivative action for the gross mismanagement of the company.

Incidentally, the term "magical incantation" is a glaring redundancy. Then it might have been an "unintended mistake". :)
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top