• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Mic

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

yvolictra

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Texas

Is a breathalyzer required to issue a MIC? My daughter was issued a MIC when she was in the presence of beer at a bowling alley. She told the officer she wasn't drinking, but he gave her the citation anyway without administering a breathalyzer. Can she fight it?
 


Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Texas

Is a breathalyzer required to issue a MIC? My daughter was issued a MIC when she was in the presence of beer at a bowling alley. She told the officer she wasn't drinking, but he gave her the citation anyway without administering a breathalyzer. Can she fight it?
Funny, even YOU don't say she wasn't drinking...I hate word-games.
 

FlyingRon

Senior Member
Did she get charged with 106.04 or .05? .04 requires consumption (which the officer may have other non-breathalizer evidence she had drunk: smell on breath, signs of intoxication). .05 only requires it to be in her possession.
The penalties are in fact the same and people misuse the terms all the time.
 

CdwJava

Senior Member
No breath test is required.

If charged for possession, she is guilty if she had the ability to exercise dominion and control over the beer. Did an adult of 21 years or more claim the beer? Or was she one of a number of minors that when asked whose beer it was, replied, "I dunno ..."

So, is she also facing penalties at home?
 

yvolictra

Junior Member
She was one of two minors in a group of many that were of drinking age. Yes, she is facing penalties at home.
 

The Occultist

Senior Member
Many jurisdictions will not even accept a breathalyser to be sole proof of intoxication. The fact is that the state will accept the police offer's expert witness testimony as evidence of whether or not the suspect was intoxicated.
 

FlyingRon

Senior Member
Many jurisdictions will not even accept a breathalyser to be sole proof of intoxication. The fact is that the state will accept the police offer's expert witness testimony as evidence of whether or not the suspect was intoxicated.
There's no need to show intoxication, just consumption for .04 or possession for .05.
Of course, intoxication pretty much implies consumption.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top