• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Misdiagnosed in the ED - loss of vision

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

mitchlep

Junior Member
What is the name of your state? OK

I was in an auto accident on 09/01/06 (Friday morning before Labor Day weekend.)

My face was swollen as if I'd been hit with a baseball bat (thanks to the airbag). I could only see shadows out of my left eye.

I was immediately driven to the emergency department and examined by an ED resident. He checked my visual acuity, visual field, and he did a SLIT lamp exam. He determined I did not have a hyphema or globe rupture, and that I only had a corneal abrasion. When the attending ED physician entered the exam room the ED resident relayed his findings to the attending. The ED attending never looked inside my eye. I asked if I should be seen at the eye institute here in Oklahoma City and he said "No. On the holiday weekend you would just be seen by a resident anyway. I think you'll be fine. Just follow up with Dr. _________ on Tuesday 09/05/06." He handed me an appointment card with this physician's name on it and a time to be at his office.

Tuesday - I arrive at the opthalmologist's office to be examined. My vision has not improved. I can only see shadows still. When the opthalmologist begins asking questions and doing a visual field exam he gets very concerned and states "the ED physician said this was just a corneal abrasion. I didn't even expect you to show up today". He takes a look inside my eye through the dilated pupil and immediately refers me to a retinal specialist. I was instructed to drive immediately (actually my wife drove) to the retinal specialist's office.

The retinal specialist was shocked that I was not referred to an opthalmologist on Friday morning. The specialist stated there was so much blood in the back of the eye it was difficult to visualize and was unsure if I had a retinal tear, detachment, or subretinal hemorrhage (SRH). He advised for and scheduled surgery on Thursday (09/07/06). It turns out I had a giant retinal tear, retinal detachment, and SRH. He repaired this but was not optimistic I would have a favorable outcome due to the time elapsed and extent of the injury.

I now have a permanent and significant (over 50%) visual field defect. I have researched this condition and keep finding that the amount of time (hours and days; not weeks) a retina is detached is directly related to the outcome and prognosis. The sooner the injury is repaired the better the outcome. In fact, the medical literature is overwhelmingly in favor of getting retinal tears and detachments repaired within 24-48 hours of injury.

My question .... Is there any liability on the ED physician and ED resident for my poor outcome and prognosis?

Thank you and sorry for the long post.
 


ellencee

Senior Member
What is the name of your state? OK

I was in an auto accident on 09/01/06 (Friday morning before Labor Day weekend.)

My face was swollen as if I'd been hit with a baseball bat (thanks to the airbag). I could only see shadows out of my left eye.

I was immediately driven to the emergency department and examined by an ED resident. He checked my visual acuity, visual field, and he did a SLIT lamp exam. He determined I did not have a hyphema or globe rupture, and that I only had a corneal abrasion. When the attending ED physician entered the exam room the ED resident relayed his findings to the attending. The ED attending never looked inside my eye. I asked if I should be seen at the eye institute here in Oklahoma City and he said "No. On the holiday weekend you would just be seen by a resident anyway. I think you'll be fine. Just follow up with Dr. _________ on Tuesday 09/05/06." He handed me an appointment card with this physician's name on it and a time to be at his office.

Tuesday - I arrive at the opthalmologist's office to be examined. My vision has not improved. I can only see shadows still. When the opthalmologist begins asking questions and doing a visual field exam he gets very concerned and states "the ED physician said this was just a corneal abrasion. I didn't even expect you to show up today". He takes a look inside my eye through the dilated pupil and immediately refers me to a retinal specialist. I was instructed to drive immediately (actually my wife drove) to the retinal specialist's office.

The retinal specialist was shocked that I was not referred to an opthalmologist on Friday morning. The specialist stated there was so much blood in the back of the eye it was difficult to visualize and was unsure if I had a retinal tear, detachment, or subretinal hemorrhage (SRH). He advised for and scheduled surgery on Thursday (09/07/06). It turns out I had a giant retinal tear, retinal detachment, and SRH. He repaired this but was not optimistic I would have a favorable outcome due to the time elapsed and extent of the injury.

I now have a permanent and significant (over 50%) visual field defect. I have researched this condition and keep finding that the amount of time (hours and days; not weeks) a retina is detached is directly related to the outcome and prognosis. The sooner the injury is repaired the better the outcome. In fact, the medical literature is overwhelmingly in favor of getting retinal tears and detachments repaired within 24-48 hours of injury.

My question .... Is there any liability on the ED physician and ED resident for my poor outcome and prognosis?

Thank you and sorry for the long post.
I think your injury deserved observation. Close follow-up with an available opthamologist is a reasonable expectation in injury with change in vision.

Consult with a personal injury attorney and a medmal attorney.

EC
 

barry1817

Senior Member
vision impairment

What is the name of your state? OK

I was in an auto accident on 09/01/06 (Friday morning before Labor Day weekend.)

My face was swollen as if I'd been hit with a baseball bat (thanks to the airbag). I could only see shadows out of my left eye.

I was immediately driven to the emergency department and examined by an ED resident. He checked my visual acuity, visual field, and he did a SLIT lamp exam. He determined I did not have a hyphema or globe rupture, and that I only had a corneal abrasion. When the attending ED physician entered the exam room the ED resident relayed his findings to the attending. The ED attending never looked inside my eye. I asked if I should be seen at the eye institute here in Oklahoma City and he said "No. On the holiday weekend you would just be seen by a resident anyway. I think you'll be fine. Just follow up with Dr. _________ on Tuesday 09/05/06." He handed me an appointment card with this physician's name on it and a time to be at his office.

Tuesday - I arrive at the opthalmologist's office to be examined. My vision has not improved. I can only see shadows still. When the opthalmologist begins asking questions and doing a visual field exam he gets very concerned and states "the ED physician said this was just a corneal abrasion. I didn't even expect you to show up today". He takes a look inside my eye through the dilated pupil and immediately refers me to a retinal specialist. I was instructed to drive immediately (actually my wife drove) to the retinal specialist's office.

The retinal specialist was shocked that I was not referred to an opthalmologist on Friday morning. The specialist stated there was so much blood in the back of the eye it was difficult to visualize and was unsure if I had a retinal tear, detachment, or subretinal hemorrhage (SRH). He advised for and scheduled surgery on Thursday (09/07/06). It turns out I had a giant retinal tear, retinal detachment, and SRH. He repaired this but was not optimistic I would have a favorable outcome due to the time elapsed and extent of the injury.

I now have a permanent and significant (over 50%) visual field defect. I have researched this condition and keep finding that the amount of time (hours and days; not weeks) a retina is detached is directly related to the outcome and prognosis. The sooner the injury is repaired the better the outcome. In fact, the medical literature is overwhelmingly in favor of getting retinal tears and detachments repaired within 24-48 hours of injury.

My question .... Is there any liability on the ED physician and ED resident for my poor outcome and prognosis?

Thank you and sorry for the long post.
I would concur that a malpractice attorney needs to look at this situation, and I am most interested in how the emergency room personal will be answering questions about the care and advice that you were given.

Malpractice, was there negligence, did the negligence cause problems and is there a financial component. The failure to diagnose, or to refer immediately might be construed as a problem that needs be addressed.

I am concerned that from your narrative a simple view of your eye disclosed something far worse than a corneal abrasion.


[email protected]
 

moburkes

Senior Member
Thanks for the advice. Does anyone recommend a good law firm in the OKC, OK area?
We don't do recommendations, but at the top of the page is a link for "Find A Lawyer", and at the bottom of the page is a link for attorneypages.com.

Good luck.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top