• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Misrepresenting a university's academic program

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

MBARipoff

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? New York

I have a few questions about the liability of a university in the case of misrepresenting an admitted applicants opportunities within an MBA program.

Here is what happened. I was admitted to a ranked MBA program. During the admissions process and after I was admitted, the faculty and current students from the school misrepresented certain aspects of the program. At this particular program, students are given the chance to select career tracks and to interview with the faculty members who were responsible for these career tracks (after admission and during the first semester). During the admissions process, it was represented to me that any career track I wanted would be available to me and that attending the MBA program would be a chance to explore any career that I chose. It was also represented that I could pursue certain specific tracks, and then gain a career in those tracks, for example, get interviews with certain high profile companies using the resources and network at this particular program (the information was shared both in writing and also verbally on 3 or 4 separate occasions).

Well, once I made the decision to attend the school, quit my current job and moved to this state, I was then told that my two top choices for career tracks would no longer be available to me, given the faculties assessment and my interview and I should then choose to pursue something else. This meant that I would not have access to certain classes and also the alumni network from the school previously mentioned to me. Also to be fair, the program did have information in writing that the administration can deny a student a career track if they so choose (this contradicted what the faculty and students had sent me previously). In addition, I do believe this constitutes a violation of a students rights at this university. Also, I later found out that one of the faculty members who discussed the program with me had claimed to have attended an Ivy League university, but after checking his curriculum vitae a couple of months later, no such Ivy League university was listed. I also suspect this decision was made for malicious reasons but this is another issue, I think.

Does this constitute fraud? Would the university be legally responsible for the misrepresentations during the admissions process? My argument is that it does constitute fraud because those promises were made in order to induce me to attend that program versus a competing one and to quit my current job and increase the acceptance yield at the school! What type of a damages judgment would I be able to receive if I were to sue?
 
Last edited:


Humusluvr

Senior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? New York

I have a few questions about the liability of a university in the case of misrepresenting an admitted applicants opportunities within an MBA program.

Here is what happened. I was admitted to a ranked MBA program. During the admissions process and after I was admitted, the faculty and current students from the school misrepresented certain aspects of the program. At this particular program, students are given the chance to select career tracks and to interview with the faculty members who were responsible for these career tracks (after admission and during the first semester). During the admissions process, it was represented to me that any career track I wanted would be available to me and that attending the MBA program would be a chance to explore any career that I chose. It was also represented that I could pursue certain specific tracks, and then gain a career in those tracks, for example, get interviews with certain high profile companies using the resources and network at this particular program (the information was shared both in writing and also verbally on 3 or 4 separate occasions).

Well, once I made the decision to attend the school, quit my current job and moved to this state, I was then told that my two top choices for career tracks would no longer be available to me, given the faculties assessment and my interview and I should then choose to pursue something else. This meant that I would not have access to certain classes and also the alumni network from the school previously mentioned to me. Also to be fair, the program did have information in writing that the administration can deny a student a career track if they so choose (this contradicted what the faculty and students had sent me previously). In addition, I do believe this constitutes a violation of a students rights at this university. Also, I later found out that one of the faculty members who discussed the program with me had claimed to have attended an Ivy League university, but after checking his curriculum vitae a couple of months later, no such Ivy League university was listed. I also suspect this decision was made for malicious reasons but this is another issue, I think.

Does this constitute fraud? Would the university be legally responsible for the misrepresentations during the admissions process? My argument is that it does constitute fraud because those promises were made in order to induce me to attend that program versus a competing one and to quit my current job and increase the acceptance yield at the school! What type of a damages judgment would I be able to receive if I were to sue?
A court would go by whatever was presented to you in writing. Whenever "discussions" are brought into play, there is always the chance that someone heard something wrong, misinterpreted, or was somehow misinformed.

You don't know that the faculty DIDNT attend the Ivy League University, just that it wasn't on his CV. Maybe he didn't put it on there, you never know why. You also didn't request his transcripts from the University, or really have any right to.

You should have gotten this career track that you preferred in writing. Chalk it up to a newbie mistake. It's not a lawsuit type of offense.
 

Humusluvr

Senior Member
During the admissions process and after I was admitted, the faculty and current students from the school misrepresented certain aspects of the program.
Why would they do that? Why would a student "misrepresent" a program? Maybe the student really did have an advantage in that area.

At this particular program, students are given the chance to select career tracks and to interview with the faculty members who were responsible for these career tracks (after admission and during the first semester). During the admissions process, it was represented to me that any career track I wanted would be available to me and that attending the MBA program would be a chance to explore any career that I chose.
Maybe they decided you would NOT be successful in that track, and would not want their names attached to your resume? At my University, professors cut ties with graduates all the time who they do not feel will be successful or promote the cause.

It was also represented that I could pursue certain specific tracks, and then gain a career in those tracks, for example, get interviews with certain high profile companies using the resources and network at this particular program (the information was shared both in writing and also verbally on 3 or 4 separate occasions).
NO UNIVERSITY would guarantee you a career. A diploma does not equal a job. Tuition does not equal a diploma. You are allowed a SHOT at it, but there is no guarantees.

Well, once I made the decision to attend the school, quit my current job and moved to this state, I was then told that my two top choices for career tracks would no longer be available to me, given the faculties assessment and my interview and I should then choose to pursue something else.
Why do you question this?

This meant that I would not have access to certain classes and also the alumni network from the school previously mentioned to me. Also to be fair, the program did have information in writing that the administration can deny a student a career track if they so choose (this contradicted what the faculty and students had sent me previously).
The school CYA'd.

In addition, I do believe this constitutes a violation of a students rights at this university.
What rights?
 

MBARipoff

Junior Member
The faculty argued that I could not achieve my first choice career track because I had a waitlist position on several other higher ranking, more presitigous MBA programs, I did my undergrad at a university with a reputation that towers above that of this one's and that of the other students, and my GMAT score was substantially above that of the average for this programs. These limiting factors would, in fact preclude me from achieving my goals in this career track (probably the reason for the misrepresentation as well).
 

stealth2

Under the Radar Member
The faculty argued that I could not achieve my first choice career track because I had a waitlist position on several other higher ranking, more presitigous MBA programs, I did my undergrad at a university with a reputation that towers above that of this one's and that of the other students, and my GMAT score was substantially above that of the average for this programs. These limiting factors would, in fact preclude me from achieving my goals in this career track (probably the reason for the misrepresentation as well).
So you are so far over the curve at the school you were planning to attend, you'd have not been successful?

I think I need another drink.
 

MBARipoff

Junior Member
Hey Stealth, I was being facetious with what I mentioned above, but yes, basically I believe it was because I was overqualified for the school and the administration got wind of that and the particular faculty member who decided this career path was in fact jealous of me and decided to get tough with some students, they were unfriendly. What I've done is shared this dishonesty with applicants for the incoming class, I'm sure that'll teach them a lesson.
 

Humusluvr

Senior Member
What I've done is shared this dishonesty with applicants for the incoming class, I'm sure that'll teach them a lesson.
That will teach WHO a lesson? The school or the applicants? Do you really believe you are such hot stuff that the faculty and students can't go on without you? I would be amazed if they were even giving it a second thought....
 

stealth2

Under the Radar Member
Hey Stealth, I was being facetious with what I mentioned above, but yes, basically I believe it was because I was overqualified for the school and the administration got wind of that and the particular faculty member who decided this career path was in fact jealous of me and decided to get tough with some students, they were unfriendly. What I've done is shared this dishonesty with applicants for the incoming class, I'm sure that'll teach them a lesson.
Dude - get over yourself and your overinflated ego. The long and the short of it? You're probably not all that you think you are. Time to accept reality.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top