J
JaniceEP
Guest
State of residence - Colorado. I have recently had a credit card contact me through a collection agency about a debt that I never knew I had. It had to at least be 5 to 6 years ago. I don't remember the card they are referencing and have never heard from them before now. I made contact with the collection agency and felt like I had to agree to some sort of payment, although I told him I could not remember the card he was speaking about. Within a week, I wrote a letter to him asking for proof of debt before I made any payments. All they sent was a standard credit card agreement with my name and social security number - no signature and no receipts with my signature. We contacted them again for proof of debt, such as an agreement with my signature, or receipts from purchases on the card. The next thing I knew I was being served papers to appear in court. Now I am being ordered to mediation which costs a minimum of $120.00. Is this fair? Shouldn't they have to provide proof of debt before dragging me into court and causing me to incur these extra court costs? I have never denied my responsiblity for this debt. I honestly do not remember having this card and I just want proof before I agree to any payments.