Need Advice

[micky5]

What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California. I am non custodial parent of an 11 year old child. The mother lives with her boyfriend and has three children with him. She did her wage and expense declaration and claimed her three children plus my daughter and her income. I want to know if she lives with her boyfriend ( the father of her other children), is it law that she reports his income, because he does work and they live together? Please advice.What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?

 

[TinkerBelleLuvr]

nope - there are only TWO parents - you and mom. The BF is NOT a party to THIS case.

And they only care about income.

 

[EnforceSupport]

Yes, Mickey, on her Income and Expense declaration, she IS required to list the income of all people living in her household, including her new boyfriend.

 

[CourtClerk]

Yes, Mickey, on her Income and Expense declaration, she IS required to list the income of all people living in her household, including her new boyfriend.

However, none of the new boyfriend's income is counted for squat - so while, she's supposed to report it, if she doesn't, it doesn't really make a difference.

 

[nextwife]

However, none of the new boyfriend's income is counted for squat - so while, she's supposed to report it, if she doesn't, it doesn't really make a difference.

However, if mom is voluntarily underemployed because she relies on BFs income, NCP CAN be certain to request that an income be imputed to her based on what she could be earning if working full time.

 

[EnforceSupport]

I know virtually nothing about modifications, rather, my expertise is enforcement, so, I'll certainly defer to you. It was my understanding though that a another's income could be considered to the extent that it helps defer household expenses, and, certainly in the cases of high earner new spouses, but, maybe I'm all wrong.

 

[CourtClerk]

However, if mom is voluntarily underemployed because she relies on BFs income, NCP CAN be certain to request that an income be imputed to her based on what she could be earning if working full time.

What does that have to do with the original question????? Or subsequent conversation? The OP has made absolutely no mention of underemployment, and in CA, there are a slew of people who are underemployed... few are having FT wages imputed to them.