that's not changing the subject. that is making one of my points I previously posted:
If there are debts of the estate, they are going to need to be paid. That condo may be the asset needed to pay the debts.
HHHmmm, sounds like OP needs to go through probate and hope there are enough assets in the rest of the estate (that the other heirs are willing to forgo) to pay the maintenance fees.
I guess this also kind of throws a bit of a shadow on this statement of the OP's:
I have lived in my Aunt's condo for over 16 years, I paid off the Mortgage ( all checks both to Condo for maintenance and mortgage company, have been in my name).
I guess OP meant all the maintenance payments that were paid are in their name. They just didn;t pay all that was due.
So much for simply transferring title. (which never was a reality anyway)
Hell, I missed this whole post:
Why> ,,because originally, after my Aunt's passing, my older sister was handling the affairs. She tried to sell but had no luck. Meanwhile, she was paying for her own home and my Aunt's condo so I moved in so she wouldn't have the burden. Now, that the neighborhood is changing, I want to be able to sell and thought that since I lived here for all those years without any help from anyone of my family, there was some legal right to possession, i.e. squatter's rights, etc.?? Do I really have to go thru Probate?
So I guess this means the aunt died over 16 years ago (OP has been living in condo 16 years and per this post, did not move in to condo until after aunt died). Nothing like taking care of business in a timely fashion.
So, with this info in mind:
You have absolutely no right to claim the condo. You cannot claim adverse possession for several reasons including you cannot calim AP against a decedents estate and you lived there with somebody's permission that seemed to have the authority to allow you to stay there.
You have been paying rent for the last 16 years and that is it. You had no contract that would allow you to claim the payments aainst the mortgage. You have been a renter for the last 16 years.
You cannot even claim the payments as a debt against the estate (which often happens when a person pays debts for the estate) because you had the benefit of living there for the last 16 years so, it is rent. Now it seems your sister may have a claim against the estate if she was making the mortgage payments and did not live there.
You may want to be able to sell but it is not yours to sell and why has nobody probated this estate in over 16 years?
Hey Dandy Don. why don;t you come on back and straighten me out on this. I seem to be so confused.