freewill39
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? New York
In New York, if a rental lease has the names of THREE would-be renters/roommates listed, and only two of the people sign the lease, are those two people bound to the lease, even if the third person's signature line is blank? Or is it only a completed legally binding document if ALL THREE potential renters who are listed sign it?
We're dealing with a shady would-be landlord to whom we gave two bank issued checks for rent and security in our rental application. After being "offered" a lease, which two out of the three of us signed (the third was working), the would-be landlord turned around and said they were not offering a lease, that the lease we had just signed was a formality, and he required a guarantor or another 2 months of rent in advance. When we declined, the landlord said he "could hold" the two of us who signed the lease to it "if he wanted to".
We got him to agree to give us back our checks so we could our separate ways, but he has not yet done this, and is not returning any calls.
If I know that the lease is not binding, then I can go after him for the checks. If what he says about the two who DID sign being responsible for the whole lease is true, then my tact needs to be different.
Informed advice? Thank you in advance.
In New York, if a rental lease has the names of THREE would-be renters/roommates listed, and only two of the people sign the lease, are those two people bound to the lease, even if the third person's signature line is blank? Or is it only a completed legally binding document if ALL THREE potential renters who are listed sign it?
We're dealing with a shady would-be landlord to whom we gave two bank issued checks for rent and security in our rental application. After being "offered" a lease, which two out of the three of us signed (the third was working), the would-be landlord turned around and said they were not offering a lease, that the lease we had just signed was a formality, and he required a guarantor or another 2 months of rent in advance. When we declined, the landlord said he "could hold" the two of us who signed the lease to it "if he wanted to".
We got him to agree to give us back our checks so we could our separate ways, but he has not yet done this, and is not returning any calls.
If I know that the lease is not binding, then I can go after him for the checks. If what he says about the two who DID sign being responsible for the whole lease is true, then my tact needs to be different.
Informed advice? Thank you in advance.