• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

opinion needed

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

elh31

Junior Member
What is the name of your state? Military living in South Carolina

I am trying to find out if we could possibly have grounds for a lawsuit. I'm not sure if I am even in the correct forum for this, when in a final divorce decree, it is ordered that a party will pay as a part of the division of things, and shall indemnify and hold the other party and their property harmless from any failure to so discharge the items gevin to them, then they turn around and let the items go to foreclosure, and repossession, therefore destroying the credit of the party. Is it grounds to sue the person responsible for not paying for their property? I know that divorce decrees in themselves have no affect on credit reporting, but how can a person be ordered to pay for their things that were in both names, then just not pay for it and get away with ruining the other persons credit? Hope this isn't too confusing!
 


I AM ALWAYS LIABLE

Senior Member
elh31 said:
What is the name of your state? Military living in South Carolina

I am trying to find out if we could possibly have grounds for a lawsuit. I'm not sure if I am even in the correct forum for this, when in a final divorce decree, it is ordered that a party will pay as a part of the division of things, and shall indemnify and hold the other party and their property harmless from any failure to so discharge the items gevin to them, then they turn around and let the items go to foreclosure, and repossession, therefore destroying the credit of the party. Is it grounds to sue the person responsible for not paying for their property? I know that divorce decrees in themselves have no affect on credit reporting, but how can a person be ordered to pay for their things that were in both names, then just not pay for it and get away with ruining the other persons credit? Hope this isn't too confusing!

My response:

You're right. You are in the wrong forum. Try again.

IAAL
 

JETX

Senior Member
elh31 said:
Hope this isn't too confusing!
It is. Quit trying to be 'coy' and tell it like it is. Oh, and you ARE in the wrong forum. Your post has NOTHING to do with defamation.
Post in 'Civil Litigation'.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top