• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

probable cause?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

zapotec

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? South Dakota
A Tyndall, SD town cop pulled my husband over 4 1/2 miles south on hwy 37 which is well out of city limits. He did not follow him from town, just came flying down the highway to catch him. My husband was only going about 40-45 mph then slowed down when he saw a car coming up fast behind him. When my husband reduced his speed to 36 is when the cop turned on his lights to pull him over. His probable cause was that my husband's tail light was not working. However, when they went to the back of the motorcycle, it was on and working. The cop said that he had noticed it earlier in town that it wasn't. Is this enough probable cause to pull someone over when you can clearly see it's working? My husband had, had a few drinks so then he was issued a DUI for the stop, no other charge. Is this something he can fight to have thrown out?
 


CdwJava

Senior Member
If the officer observed the tail light not working properly, that is sufficient reasonable suspicion to detain the driver of a vehicle (i.e. to make the stop).

Your husband's attorney can attempt to suppress the evidence by challenging the reasonable suspicion for the stop, but it is a longshot. But, if it is all he has, he may have nothing to lose by trying.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top