• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

RE Seller's Disclosure Statement Missouri

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

G

globalassoc

Guest
Sold Home 6 mos. ago. Buyer had an inspection and was himself, a real estate broker. Sued me in small claims court for
a leak in the roof. My statement on disclosure statement was; "old roof leaked
(Replaced) age 1 year old."
Buyer says that I misrepresented to him that there was a new roof. What defense can I use in this case?
 


HomeGuru

Senior Member
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by globalassoc:
Sold Home 6 mos. ago. Buyer had an
inspection and was himself, a real estate
broker. Sued me in small claims court
for
a leak in the roof. My statement on
disclosure statement was; "old roof
leaked
(Replaced) age 1 year old."
Buyer says that I misrepresented to him
that there was a new roof. What defense
can I use in this case?
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Although you failed to state whether in
fact the roof is new, the buyer relied on
your disclosure that the roof was
replaced and 1 year old. When you used
the words and terms "replaced" and "age 1
year old" the buyer ( even as a real
estate broker) would have the
understanding that the roof was replaced
new and is 1 year old. You as the seller
had a duty to the buyer to disclose the
exact and complete details on where the
roof leaked, what was done to fix the
problem, methods and areas of repair or
replacement, was the entire roof replaced
or only certain sections, was the roof
framing/system replaced or only the roof
covering, was roof sheathing, flashing
etc. replaced or just the roof covering,
who did the work: homeowner/seller,
handyman or licensed and/or professional
experienced roofer, what are the terms of
the warranty if any etc. You would have a
defense only if you disclosed everything
about the roof ie. specified exactly the
locations of the leaks, that the roof was
not a new roof, exactly what areas were
replaced, how and by whom, the roof is
sold in as-is condition and you give no
warranties as to the condition. If you
have this agreement in writing then you
may be protected. It appears in this case
that your disclosure was ambiguous and
not full and complete. If the current
leak is in the same area as the old leak,
then it may be established that the
corrective replacement was defective.
 

I AM ALWAYS LIABLE

Senior Member
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by HomeGuru:
Although you failed to state whether in
fact the roof is new, the buyer relied on
your disclosure that the roof was
replaced and 1 year old. When you used
the words and terms "replaced" and "age 1
year old" the buyer ( even as a real
estate broker) would have the
understanding that the roof was replaced
new and is 1 year old. You as the seller
had a duty to the buyer to disclose the
exact and complete details on where the
roof leaked, what was done to fix the
problem, methods and areas of repair or
replacement, was the entire roof replaced
or only certain sections, was the roof
framing/system replaced or only the roof
covering, was roof sheathing, flashing
etc. replaced or just the roof covering,
who did the work: homeowner/seller,
handyman or licensed and/or professional
experienced roofer, what are the terms of
the warranty if any etc. You would have a
defense only if you disclosed everything
about the roof ie. specified exactly the
locations of the leaks, that the roof was
not a new roof, exactly what areas were
replaced, how and by whom, the roof is
sold in as-is condition and you give no
warranties as to the condition. If you
have this agreement in writing then you
may be protected. It appears in this case
that your disclosure was ambiguous and
not full and complete. If the current
leak is in the same area as the old leak,
then it may be established that the
corrective replacement was defective.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

My response:

Welcome to the fray, HomeGuru ! Nice to have someone like yourself here, and especially with your background. The above answer is not only terrific, but very understandable.

Again, welcome.

IAAL



------------------
By reading the “Response” to your question or comment, you agree that: The opinions expressed herein by "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE" are designed to provide educational information only and are not intended to, nor do they, offer legal advice. Opinions expressed to you in this site are not intended to, nor does it, create an attorney-client relationship, nor does it constitute legal advice to any person reviewing such information. No electronic communication with "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE," on its own, will generate an attorney-client relationship, nor will it be considered an attorney-client privileged communication. You further agree that you will obtain your own attorney's advice and counsel for your questions responded to herein by "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE."

 
G

globalassoc

Guest
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by I AM ALWAYS LIABLE:
My response:

Welcome to the fray, HomeGuru ! Nice to have someone like yourself here, and especially with your background. The above answer is not only terrific, but very understandable.
From Globalassoc.
Don't you think that the Buyer should have had the roof inspected since he had an inspection done prior to purchase?

Again, welcome.

IAAL

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top