What is the name of your state? Michigan.
Last year my car was totaled when some moron pulled in front of an oncoming car. No one hurt but I got to experiance our "no fault" insurance for the first time. Seems as long as the guilty party is covered, I cannot sue for damages and had to settle for a whopping 500 bucks. Three lawyers told me our "mini tort" laws protect against law suites. Swell! (I swear the guy was stoned too.)
After that I put ALL our vehicals (four now) on full coverage believing that at least we would get blue book value if this ever happens again.
Well about a week ago, a huge tree came down on my 1991 mazda and amazingly only broke the rear window and dented the quarter panel. I know that car is old but it's in PERFECT condition. Not even a speck of rust on the wheel wells. Nothing. Blue book shows it worth between 1650 and 2300 bucks. Even our adjustor (who just left) came up with 1600 as a value. Repair estimates range between 1100 and 1300. So WHY is this car a total? Since when does "FULL coverage" only mean 80%??? I was NEVER told that when I ordered full coverage. The adjustor told me the company may "offer" to buy my car then sell it back to me for half as a "salvage." Which translates to 800 dollars. Why oh why am I paying for FULL coverage if all I'd get is the same few hundred bucks for a 1600+ car?
I want to fight this! Not afraid of going to court. Even against an insurance company. No fear! Need advice here.
Last year my car was totaled when some moron pulled in front of an oncoming car. No one hurt but I got to experiance our "no fault" insurance for the first time. Seems as long as the guilty party is covered, I cannot sue for damages and had to settle for a whopping 500 bucks. Three lawyers told me our "mini tort" laws protect against law suites. Swell! (I swear the guy was stoned too.)
After that I put ALL our vehicals (four now) on full coverage believing that at least we would get blue book value if this ever happens again.
Well about a week ago, a huge tree came down on my 1991 mazda and amazingly only broke the rear window and dented the quarter panel. I know that car is old but it's in PERFECT condition. Not even a speck of rust on the wheel wells. Nothing. Blue book shows it worth between 1650 and 2300 bucks. Even our adjustor (who just left) came up with 1600 as a value. Repair estimates range between 1100 and 1300. So WHY is this car a total? Since when does "FULL coverage" only mean 80%??? I was NEVER told that when I ordered full coverage. The adjustor told me the company may "offer" to buy my car then sell it back to me for half as a "salvage." Which translates to 800 dollars. Why oh why am I paying for FULL coverage if all I'd get is the same few hundred bucks for a 1600+ car?
I want to fight this! Not afraid of going to court. Even against an insurance company. No fear! Need advice here.