Subjection
Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? WI
I live on a quiet residential road that's just off a main street. Right now (and in the past) there is some street maintenance being done on the main road. As a result, they are detouring all the traffic from the main street to the residential road in front of my house. A great deal of this traffic includes semi trucks, which can legally weigh as much as 40 tons. Residential roads are not designed or reinforced to handle this much weight. The road is designed for passenger vehicles. With several hundred of these trucks and other heavy vehicles passing through the residential area each day, the damage to the road is becoming obvious that the pavement is going to need replacing very soon. Guess who normally pays for residential? The residents of that street!
So here's my question....is it even legal for the city to direct heavy vehicle traffic to roads that aren't designed to handle the weight in the first place? Especially when the repairs have to be covered by the residents there? Is there any way that the cost could be diverted to the city's street department main fund rather than on the backs of the residents of the street? It's almost like if a parking lot in the city had to be repaved, they divert all the cars that would normally park there onto somone's front lawn and then the homeowner has to pay for the damage to their yard afterwards. It just doesn't seem right.
I live on a quiet residential road that's just off a main street. Right now (and in the past) there is some street maintenance being done on the main road. As a result, they are detouring all the traffic from the main street to the residential road in front of my house. A great deal of this traffic includes semi trucks, which can legally weigh as much as 40 tons. Residential roads are not designed or reinforced to handle this much weight. The road is designed for passenger vehicles. With several hundred of these trucks and other heavy vehicles passing through the residential area each day, the damage to the road is becoming obvious that the pavement is going to need replacing very soon. Guess who normally pays for residential? The residents of that street!
So here's my question....is it even legal for the city to direct heavy vehicle traffic to roads that aren't designed to handle the weight in the first place? Especially when the repairs have to be covered by the residents there? Is there any way that the cost could be diverted to the city's street department main fund rather than on the backs of the residents of the street? It's almost like if a parking lot in the city had to be repaved, they divert all the cars that would normally park there onto somone's front lawn and then the homeowner has to pay for the damage to their yard afterwards. It just doesn't seem right.