J
JSzynskie
Guest
Please help. This began in the summer of 1996, a brief discription of events as follows:
G.R.(roofing contractor) and Mr.X (consumer) entered into a contract, which states: all shingles will be removed & the
roof decking (plywood) will be replaced,new
shingles will be put on and all trash will be removed. The new roof decking will be supplied by the homeowner, shingles and labor supplied by G.R. All labor is guaranteed 5 yrs.
G.R. informed Mr.X he has a moisture problem in the attic and that is why his roof was in the condition that it is. G.R. installed 2 extra vents.
So 2 years later, Mr.X calls G.R. and insist on G.R. replacing the whole roof
because the roof is beginning to bow. G.R.
replied he would pay for half of the cost.
Reminding Mr.X he was informed he had a moisture problem and the roof decking was supplied by him and the decking was faulty, not the shingles, that seemed a reasonable
effort to remied the situation.
Mr.X has threaten to sue 3 times before,
but now is sueing in small claims court. We have tried to be as fair as we see it, but now it's ruffled my feathers and I don't know what to do about it.
Please, any advise on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You.
[This message has been edited by JSzynskie (edited April 10, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by JSzynskie (edited April 10, 2000).]
G.R.(roofing contractor) and Mr.X (consumer) entered into a contract, which states: all shingles will be removed & the
roof decking (plywood) will be replaced,new
shingles will be put on and all trash will be removed. The new roof decking will be supplied by the homeowner, shingles and labor supplied by G.R. All labor is guaranteed 5 yrs.
G.R. informed Mr.X he has a moisture problem in the attic and that is why his roof was in the condition that it is. G.R. installed 2 extra vents.
So 2 years later, Mr.X calls G.R. and insist on G.R. replacing the whole roof
because the roof is beginning to bow. G.R.
replied he would pay for half of the cost.
Reminding Mr.X he was informed he had a moisture problem and the roof decking was supplied by him and the decking was faulty, not the shingles, that seemed a reasonable
effort to remied the situation.
Mr.X has threaten to sue 3 times before,
but now is sueing in small claims court. We have tried to be as fair as we see it, but now it's ruffled my feathers and I don't know what to do about it.
Please, any advise on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You.
[This message has been edited by JSzynskie (edited April 10, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by JSzynskie (edited April 10, 2000).]