beckiemoore
Junior Member
What is the name of your state? NH
I am wondering if you could help me understand the grandfather clause that allows for an elementary school to remain open if there are no sprinkler systems in place in parts of the building, and if fire walls have been impaired to allow cables to pass through and electical wires to not be insulated to todays standards It is my understanding that this is allowed because it wasn't code at the time the building was built. While I understand that codes change frequently and requiring buildings to continue to change to meet every code would be logistically and financially impossible. However, I find it hard to believe that such major code issues can be overlooked, citing a grandfather clause, to me this seems akin to letting my mother drive my children around without car seats because they weren't required when she was raising her children. (Maybe that's the grandmother clause
While I understand that this is a sensitive subject, I am trying to understand the grandfather clause in general, and if this was the way the clause was intended to be used. And what, if anything, can be done to increase the safety of children in said schools. I cannot bear to think of the disaster which could occur in the event of a fire, when trying to get first and second grade students out of such a building.
Any input is much appreciated!
I am wondering if you could help me understand the grandfather clause that allows for an elementary school to remain open if there are no sprinkler systems in place in parts of the building, and if fire walls have been impaired to allow cables to pass through and electical wires to not be insulated to todays standards It is my understanding that this is allowed because it wasn't code at the time the building was built. While I understand that codes change frequently and requiring buildings to continue to change to meet every code would be logistically and financially impossible. However, I find it hard to believe that such major code issues can be overlooked, citing a grandfather clause, to me this seems akin to letting my mother drive my children around without car seats because they weren't required when she was raising her children. (Maybe that's the grandmother clause
While I understand that this is a sensitive subject, I am trying to understand the grandfather clause in general, and if this was the way the clause was intended to be used. And what, if anything, can be done to increase the safety of children in said schools. I cannot bear to think of the disaster which could occur in the event of a fire, when trying to get first and second grade students out of such a building.
Any input is much appreciated!