• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Secret Video Recording: Workplace Harassment

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.
L

littlehideko

Guest
What is the name of your state?

California

What are the regulations regarding the following?:

The victim employee secretly video recording other employees thereby proving malicious activity at the victim employee's personal desk space.
 
Last edited:


Beth3

Senior Member
Cal. Penal Code §§ 631, 632: It is a crime in California to intercept or eavesdrop upon any confidential communication, including a telephone call or wire communication, without the consent of all parties.

It is also a crime to disclose information obtained from such an interception. A first offense is punishable by a fine of up to $2,500 and imprisonment for no more than one year. Subsequent offenses carry a maximum fine of $10,000 and jail sentence of up to one year.

Eavesdropping upon or recording a conversation, whether by telephone (including cordless or cellular telephone) or in person, that a person would reasonably expect to be confined to the parties present, carries the same penalty as intercepting telephone or wire communications.

Conversations occurring at any public gathering that one should expect to be overheard, including any legislative, judicial or executive proceeding open to the public, are not covered by the law.

An appellate court has ruled that using a hidden video camera violates the statute. California v. Gibbons, 215 Cal. App. 3d 1204 (1989). However, a television network that used a hidden camera to videotape a conversation that took place at a business lunch meeting on a crowded outdoor patio of a public restaurant that did not include "secret" information did not violate the Penal Code's prohibition against eavesdropping because it was not a "confidential communication." Wilkins v. NBC, Inc., 71 Cal. App. 4th 1066 (1999).

Anyone injured by a violation of the wiretapping laws can recover civil damages of $5,000 or three times actual damages, whichever is greater. Cal. Penal Code § 637.2(a). A civil action for invasion of privacy also may be brought against the person who committed the violation. Cal. Penal Code § 637.2.


If you're doing the videotaping (a) you are on extremely shaky legal ground and (b) regardless of whether or not it's legal, your employer is perfectly free to terminate you on the spot for video/audio taping without management's permission. You do NOT have the right to bring a recording device onto your employer's private property.
 
L

littlehideko

Guest
I have seen and heard of cases where the victim of sexual abuse secretly records a co-worker unzipping their pants and dangling their private organs in view of the victim whilst they are busy working.

Can you explain this?
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
Listen, you have been told now three times that you can be fired or face criminal charges and you still want to argue?

How about you go to your employer, tell him/her that you purposely diverted their security camera for your own purpose and see how it plays out.

I'm not doing your legal research for you.
 
L

littlehideko

Guest
BelizeBreeze said:
Listen, you have been told now three times that you can be fired or face criminal charges and you still want to argue?

How about you go to your employer, tell him/her that you purposely diverted their security camera for your own purpose and see how it plays out.

I'm not doing your legal research for you.
If you don't want to answer my earnest questions, then don't. You seem to have an attitude problem. I'm not trying to justify any behavior, just trying to learn more about this area of law. After all, isn't this FREE ADVICE? Or do people have to listen to some critical guy run his chops every time they probe a matter?

Obviously you jump to conclusions. I didn't "purposely" divert existing security equipment. I rigged some old video conferencing parts we had laying around the shop and built a micky-mouse surveillance system.

I'm more than willing to face the consequences for my stupid actions, but listening to some guy like you provide quick, dry, and potentially insulting comments is wasting people's time.

I don't care how much you know and abide by the "law". Some of the most corrupt and hardened people are involved in law. They will stand the Judgement and give an account for everything they have done on That Day.

Donald, please don't do legal research for me.
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
I didn't "purposely" divert existing security equipment. I rigged some old video conferencing parts we had laying around the shop and built a micky-mouse surveillance system.
Theft of private property.

Case Closed. :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top