• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Section 30 Texas' penal code

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mae Chang

Junior Member
I have little knowledge of the legal footing I may have as having had to be forced by a judge to waiver my rights to file suit, after in 2016 I was criminally held as a suspect for purchasing a meal at Mcdonalds. Thought the bill if rights was invaluable not worthy of fines and dues. Anyway impovershished now, and unable to exert my influence as having also a terroristic threat charge as well, taboot I am a Vietnamese American. Infringement of a copyright isn't the notion here although, its why are they behaving as law enforcement. How is this protecting employees from retaliation? Dont see a viable argument to place the occupancy in harms way with armed service personel. Who and what are they protecting? Furthermore I heard of other Vietnamese friends who were assaulted by prisoners for the same charges? Unacceptable and will not be tolerated.
 


quincy

Senior Member
I have little knowledge of the legal footing I may have as having had to be forced by a judge to waiver my rights to file suit, after in 2016 I was criminally held as a suspect for purchasing a meal at Mcdonalds. Thought the bill if rights was invaluable not worthy of fines and dues. Anyway impovershished now, and unable to exert my influence as having also a terroristic threat charge as well, taboot I am a Vietnamese American. Infringement of a copyright isn't the notion here although, its why are they behaving as law enforcement. How is this protecting employees from retaliation? Dont see a viable argument to place the occupancy in harms way with armed service personel. Who and what are they protecting? Furthermore I heard of other Vietnamese friends who were assaulted by prisoners for the same charges? Unacceptable and will not be tolerated.
I have no idea what you are talking about.

What do your concerns have to do with consumer contracts?
 

Mae Chang

Junior Member
Reply

I was under the assumption that me as a consumer have rights to use legal tender. I don't understand why you cannot comprehend quincy that chapter 30 is allowing customers like me to be discriminated based on appearance alone if those are the justifications. My argument was quite simple. The bill of rights allows a law abiding individual to not have judgment passed for any reason based on the outlined. My question was why are franchises say those that make headlines, such as whataburger, trying to presume guilt of the rights of law enforcement. In my opinion the causby v us already determined, public building as such. Legal tender is good for public and private debts. I was taken to jail for criminally trespassing for trying exert purchasing power. Civil rights shouldn't have rights to liability either because furthermore as I said the document is invaluable. Why is a court system justifying fines and dues? Why is your profession presuming guilt? Why are you placing customers in harms way? Both unacceptable and intolerable.
 

quincy

Senior Member
I was under the assumption that me as a consumer have rights to use legal tender. I don't understand why you cannot comprehend quincy that chapter 30 is allowing customers like me to be discriminated based on appearance alone if those are the justifications. My argument was quite simple. The bill of rights allows a law abiding individual to not have judgment passed for any reason based on the outlined. My question was why are franchises say those that make headlines, such as whataburger, trying to presume guilt of the rights of law enforcement. In my opinion the causby v us already determined, public building as such. Legal tender is good for public and private debts. I was taken to jail for criminally trespassing for trying exert purchasing power. Civil rights shouldn't have rights to liability either because furthermore as I said the document is invaluable. Why is a court system justifying fines and dues? Why is your profession presuming guilt? Why are you placing customers in harms way? Both unacceptable and intolerable.
You mentioned copyright in your original post. We will start there. What's up with that?
 

Just Blue

Senior Member
I was under the assumption that me as a consumer have rights to use legal tender. I don't understand why you cannot comprehend quincy that chapter 30 is allowing customers like me to be discriminated based on appearance alone if those are the justifications. My argument was quite simple. The bill of rights allows a law abiding individual to not have judgment passed for any reason based on the outlined. My question was why are franchises say those that make headlines, such as whataburger, trying to presume guilt of the rights of law enforcement. In my opinion the causby v us already determined, public building as such. Legal tender is good for public and private debts. I was taken to jail for criminally trespassing for trying exert purchasing power. Civil rights shouldn't have rights to liability either because furthermore as I said the document is invaluable. Why is a court system justifying fines and dues? Why is your profession presuming guilt? Why are you placing customers in harms way? Both unacceptable and intolerable.
I suggest you seek help in the mental health sector of your town/city/state.
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
There is much that is wrong with the posts by Mae Chang. That assumption is just one of many.
Yep, but I have a feeling that the entire matter stems from the OP trying to pay for food and the establishment refusing to accept the money, followed by the OP making a stink and the establishment calling the cops.

This thread was reported.
That's probably for the best.
 

quincy

Senior Member
Yep, but I have a feeling that the entire matter stems from the OP trying to pay for food and the establishment refusing to accept the money, followed by the OP making a stink and the establishment calling the cops.

That's probably for the best.
I have a feeling that the entire matter stems from the OP's imagination and boredom.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top