misintexas
Junior Member
What is the name of your state? TX
Our medium-sized hospital was recently merged (bought out, rather) by a larger Health Care company. They decided to create a new entity instead of rolling us into the corporate mother. The employees were given a 30 day deadline to sign up for our new benefits package and a corporate HR person came and gave several presentations and our HR department sent out several memos and e-mails explaining and outlining the changes and our choices. They gave us until 04.01.2007 to sign up and most of the emploees were able to comply and made choices based on the information we were given. On 04.01.2007 (the date of the deadline) we received an e-mail from the HR director stating that there was a change in our providor coverage and that the Dr's who we were told would be included in a group that allowed for a no co-pay schedule (that charged more per month and most employees joined) would now be in another group that required a 15% co-pay and that NO Dr's would be in the other group. The e-mail stated that this was done "locally" and the reason given was to "assure the same quality physician services that plan participants have grown accustomed to". I guess my questions are 1. Does a self-funded insurance plan have to live up to it's previous statements, or can they simply change everything at will? 2. How transparent does a self-funded insurance plan have to be? (I asked HR who the plan's director was, but was told that would not/could not be disclosed to me.) 3. What rights do members of a self-funded insurance plan have when it comes to information regarding HOW the plan is administered?
Thank you,
MIS in Texas
Our medium-sized hospital was recently merged (bought out, rather) by a larger Health Care company. They decided to create a new entity instead of rolling us into the corporate mother. The employees were given a 30 day deadline to sign up for our new benefits package and a corporate HR person came and gave several presentations and our HR department sent out several memos and e-mails explaining and outlining the changes and our choices. They gave us until 04.01.2007 to sign up and most of the emploees were able to comply and made choices based on the information we were given. On 04.01.2007 (the date of the deadline) we received an e-mail from the HR director stating that there was a change in our providor coverage and that the Dr's who we were told would be included in a group that allowed for a no co-pay schedule (that charged more per month and most employees joined) would now be in another group that required a 15% co-pay and that NO Dr's would be in the other group. The e-mail stated that this was done "locally" and the reason given was to "assure the same quality physician services that plan participants have grown accustomed to". I guess my questions are 1. Does a self-funded insurance plan have to live up to it's previous statements, or can they simply change everything at will? 2. How transparent does a self-funded insurance plan have to be? (I asked HR who the plan's director was, but was told that would not/could not be disclosed to me.) 3. What rights do members of a self-funded insurance plan have when it comes to information regarding HOW the plan is administered?
Thank you,
MIS in Texas