sitedrifter
Member
What is the name of your state? NJ
First, attorney review has taken 27 days largely due to the seller and their lawyer delays. While the seller agreed to most of my requests during attorney review (trust me, nothing big just standard legal ease), they balked at my appraisal and closing date contingency (to coincide with my closing of the house I am selling) requests. Both of those are such standard requests but they said *NO*. So we get past that (I caved) and now comes requests from me based on the home inspection. Lots of problems with many minor but the major ones are the leaking toilet and bad flooring (small amounts of rot in the sub floor) in the bathroom and the 4 posts that support the front porch roof which need to be replaced (rotted at base of posts). The owner said no to my request to repair so I countered with a 10K credit request at closing. The owner countered with *NO*. What is this persons problem? This person bought this house as an investment 5 months ago, put a bit of money into the home and now seems to want to get every penny of the selling price. I know that is their choice but, I feel they are giving lowsy performance as a seller. They won't even agree to fix the leaking toilet. Am I really being penalized for using a good home inspector who found these things.,,,, sheesh!
Does anyone have any ideas on how to deal with a seller like this? Should I just use my home inspection contingency to back out? My contract plainly states I can and shows no sign of penalties but the way these sellers are, I am afraid they will try and keep my earnest monies. I am really trying to justify this as I already have 2k into this process (not counting earnest money) between the home inspection, lawyer etc. Plus the fact my house I am living in (I own) is sold and set to close in 2 weeks although there is a contingency that I have to have purchased a new home to close.
Talk about stress
Thanks
Site
First, attorney review has taken 27 days largely due to the seller and their lawyer delays. While the seller agreed to most of my requests during attorney review (trust me, nothing big just standard legal ease), they balked at my appraisal and closing date contingency (to coincide with my closing of the house I am selling) requests. Both of those are such standard requests but they said *NO*. So we get past that (I caved) and now comes requests from me based on the home inspection. Lots of problems with many minor but the major ones are the leaking toilet and bad flooring (small amounts of rot in the sub floor) in the bathroom and the 4 posts that support the front porch roof which need to be replaced (rotted at base of posts). The owner said no to my request to repair so I countered with a 10K credit request at closing. The owner countered with *NO*. What is this persons problem? This person bought this house as an investment 5 months ago, put a bit of money into the home and now seems to want to get every penny of the selling price. I know that is their choice but, I feel they are giving lowsy performance as a seller. They won't even agree to fix the leaking toilet. Am I really being penalized for using a good home inspector who found these things.,,,, sheesh!
Does anyone have any ideas on how to deal with a seller like this? Should I just use my home inspection contingency to back out? My contract plainly states I can and shows no sign of penalties but the way these sellers are, I am afraid they will try and keep my earnest monies. I am really trying to justify this as I already have 2k into this process (not counting earnest money) between the home inspection, lawyer etc. Plus the fact my house I am living in (I own) is sold and set to close in 2 weeks although there is a contingency that I have to have purchased a new home to close.
Talk about stress
Thanks
Site