Please excuse my ignorance. I am sure these are very basic concepts to a lot of people but they�re new to me. I�ll try to summarize this scenario as I understand it.
Mobil registers Signum as their service mark to make the service they provide uniquely identifiable in their industry and to give consumers confidence that when they see the name Signum, in essence, they�re getting the real deal.
You say that I should not start an engineering services company using the name Signum or even Sygnum because Mobil has registered it as their service mark. Mobil would ultimately find out, make me stop, and possibly force me to pay damages in the process.
But then you tell me that there are 17 other companies all using Signum or variations thereof for their trademarks.
So my question is, why is Mobil not suing them and/or, why are they not constantly suing each other?
There are only so many words in the English language. Signum for example is a mathematical operator that has probably been around longer than the intellectual property laws that allow only certain companies to use it. Wouldn�t any company trying to sue another for using the same name have to demonstrate that they incurred some sort of loss as a result?
I�m not disputing that you�re giving good advice and that the safest route here is pick something that no one else is using. I�m just struggling to understand how 17 different companies can all be using similar names and how that�s OK, but if I started a company using that name, it would not.
Thanks for your input and clarification. I know math and physics, legal principles, not so much.
Actually, Zig, Mobil has only one of the Signum's registered. The other 16 are registered by other companies - but they are all in different fields and many are from different countries. I think I worded my prior sentence in a confusing way.
Exxon Mobil registered Signum in 2009, after 8 years of use to identify their testing analysis lubricants business.
The difference with your Signum, vne147, is that your business could potentially be seen as competing with Mobil, whereas a photography business and a fertilizer business are not.
In addition, you have a problem with companies that are already using your proposed names of Signum Engineering and Signum Technologies, so those names if used by you would confuse in consumers' minds which company is which.
It is possible for companies, products or services to share the same trademarked name, and logos of companies are often similar. There are no legal challenges made to these dual uses because there is no consumer confusion generated. The consumer market is different. ABC as a broadcasting company, for example, is unlikely to be confused with an ABC appliance warehouse.
I doubt if you would be able to register your Signum name, in other words, without opposition from more than one already existing Signum - Mobil, because your business is similar to theirs, and others because the same name could direct traffic away from the first company to your company, causing confusion.
As for "there are only so many words in the English language," estimates range from Oxford Dictionary's estimate of 171,476 in current use with 47,156 obsolete words and 9500 derivative words, to The Global Language Monitor's 2014 estimate of 1,025,109.8.* And these estimates do not include invented words or combined words used by many companies to distinguish their company from all the rest. Plenty of words to go around.
*sources:
http://www.languagemonitor.com/number-of-words/number-of-words-in-the-english-language-1008879/ and
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/words/how-many-words-are-there-in-the-english-language