• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Should I give up?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? PA
Good evening,
I went out on medical October 20. I phoned HR & they told me to call my employer's medical department & make my own appointment. The date I was given was January 24.
About the 2nd week of January, one supervisor phoned me so that I can pick my vacation days. I then told him I'll see him on January 25.
My employer informed me they sent me a Medical Directive in January via Certified & regular mail to see their physician January 20 & get cleared return to work. I never received either letter. They have a copy of the letter being signed from someone, but it was no one in my house who signed the letter.
On January 19, my employer's medical department phoned to change the time of the appointment I made. They never mentioned I had an appointment on January 20.
On January 21, I saw my personal physician who released me from his care & wrote a note stating I can return to work January 25. Also, on January 21, I phoned my department to tell them I would return on January 25. I was then told by my supervisor, that I was dropped from the role & had to talk to my union.
January 24, I received a registered or certified notice from the post office & I personally went to sign & get the letter stating I was dropped from the role. I also received the letter via regular mail on the same day.
I had a grievance & my manager & director showed me the receipt of a signature with my last name, but again no one in my house signed this certified letter, nor did I receive the letter via regular mail. They then brought up my work record & attendance & told me they didn't want me to return.
They've denied me unemployment & the denial letter stated I should've known about the medical directive. They base this on the fact that I signed a form for the department policy & procedures when I was hired back in May, 2006. Sure I read it at that time, but I don't recall anything about a medical directive. Also the signature that matches no one in my house was a deciding factor.
There seem to be mitigating circumstances here. Can I go to EEOC with this? I've never been in this situation before. I want to return to work, go to another department or be able to collect unemployment. I'm scared & confused & need advice. Thanks in advance.
 


davidmcbeth3

Senior Member
I don't see an EEOC complaint here. Looks like the letter was received and you did not go...from my viewpoint. (and yes I see where you say this is not true)
 

Betty

Senior Member
Based on what you posted, I don't see an EEOC complaint here either.

You can appeal the unemployment ins. denial if you haven't already. It never hurts to appeal.
 

Beth3

Senior Member
I had a grievance & my manager & director showed me the receipt of a signature with my last name, but again no one in my house signed this certified letter, nor did I receive the letter via regular mail.

From your employer's perspective and apparently that of the UC Division, they have proof that you received the letter.

They've denied me unemployment & the denial letter stated I should've known about the medical directive. They base this on the fact that I signed a form for the department policy & procedures when I was hired back in May, 2006. Sure I read it at that time, but I don't recall anything about a medical directive.

It's your responsibility to know the contents of the employee handbook. That's why they give you a copy and have you sign a receipt.

Can I go to EEOC with this?

Your situation has nothing to do with the EEOC. Contacting them would be a complete waste of your time and theirs.

You can appeal the unemployment decision if you haven't already and it's not too late. Other than that, I suggest you start looking for a new job.
 

csi7

Senior Member
When someone signs for a certified receipt, the printed name and time and address are also on the receipt. Did you see a copy of the exact receipt to verify whose signature it was?
 
Yes I saw the signature, someone signed for the letter using my last name, but it was no one in my household!
 
Last edited:
Update

Good afternoon, I really appreciate your service & I consider every post. I received a phone call from my union rep. He told me my department withheld their original decision from my 2nd grievance & don't want me back. I would still like to at least try to appeal my denial for unemployment. My union rep also told me he's going to speak to his lawyer about my situation.
Should I bother, or as one reply to this thread said find another job? Thanks in advance.
 

Beth3

Senior Member
You have nothing to lose by appealing the UC Initial Determination so you may as well. You should also start looking for a new job. This is not an either-or situation - you need to do both.

Even if you are granted unemployment benefits (which seems doubtful), that doesn't mean your employer has to reinstate you. It simply means that you weren't terminated for a reason that would disalow unemployment benefits.

Time's a wasting - you only have a limited period of time to request a hearing. You first posted on 3/15 and now it's 3/21. You may only have a day or two left (if that) to request a hearing for unemployment benefits.
 
Just want to move on

Thank you! I have until 3/28/11 to appeal, which I'll be filing in the morning.
Do you think I should call my union rep and tell him to forget talking to his lawyer and cut my losses? If I do call my rep and he asks why, what can I possibly tell him and still try to walk away from all of this, because I don't seem to be getting anywhere?!:confused:
 
Last edited:

Beth3

Senior Member
The unemployment appeal/hearing process is set up so that nobody needs legal representation. The hearing adjudicator will lead all parties present through the process and ensure that all relevant testimony is heard and documentary evidence is presented. You just don't need an attorney for this. Plus UC statutes are not complicated - there's no legal maneuvering that takes place like in a courtroom. The adjudicator will render a decision based on the law and any relevant precedents. You will already have an impartial legal expert at the UC hearing.

What you want to pursue with your union regarding your termination is an entirely separate matter and completely up to you.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top