ProPerDoper
Member
What is the name of your state? CA
Sale of residential rental/investment property occurred in 2006. In October of 2006, trial on reserved issues including support was held. Support was calculated, but ~ $85,000 of long term capital gains from sale of real estate investment rental property by one of the parties was not input.
Support was requested against those long term gains, but denied as "argument not pursuasive".
Judges rarely advise why they rule the way they do. If the gain was from investments such as stocks/bonds or other regularly accepted funds, the court would have input that into the DissoMaster without question.
I have read case law in the past where residential real estate equity cannot be considered for support. (Orange County CA case...I believe) Does this same prescident apply for residential real estate clearly held as investment property?
Sale of residential rental/investment property occurred in 2006. In October of 2006, trial on reserved issues including support was held. Support was calculated, but ~ $85,000 of long term capital gains from sale of real estate investment rental property by one of the parties was not input.
Support was requested against those long term gains, but denied as "argument not pursuasive".
Judges rarely advise why they rule the way they do. If the gain was from investments such as stocks/bonds or other regularly accepted funds, the court would have input that into the DissoMaster without question.
I have read case law in the past where residential real estate equity cannot be considered for support. (Orange County CA case...I believe) Does this same prescident apply for residential real estate clearly held as investment property?