BigVinnie1369
Junior Member
I work for a company in CA (but the company is a large national chain). As I have been with the company for 2 years I can accrue up to 140 hours of PTO (1.75 times my set vavation time per year). Being that I am in CA my company has chosen to roll over PTO instead of paying it out at the end of the year.
I understand that a time off request can be denied for multiple reasons but I am now being told by my boss that even though I can accrue additional PTO after taking my alotted 80 hours I can't use it until the next calandar year. To me this seems to be circumnavigating the CA rollover/buy out law. Is what my employer saying legal?
I understand that a time off request can be denied for multiple reasons but I am now being told by my boss that even though I can accrue additional PTO after taking my alotted 80 hours I can't use it until the next calandar year. To me this seems to be circumnavigating the CA rollover/buy out law. Is what my employer saying legal?