M
mtkelso
Guest
My girlfriend once got caught driving w/out insurance in VT, several years ago. She was told that she needed to be insured for 3 consecutive years to clear the SR-22.
However, she recently totalled her car, and learned that the state of VT removed the SR-22 back in August of 2000. Since then, she has been paying the heftier insurance costs in FL, and also CA (in CA, the entire policy was started after the SR-22 was cleared.)
My question is perhaps obvious: What are the chances of getting the insurance companies to reimburce the difference, as they have been charging the expensive SR-22 rates, which were 2x-3x the normal cost of insurance? Isn't this akin to fraud?
However, she recently totalled her car, and learned that the state of VT removed the SR-22 back in August of 2000. Since then, she has been paying the heftier insurance costs in FL, and also CA (in CA, the entire policy was started after the SR-22 was cleared.)
My question is perhaps obvious: What are the chances of getting the insurance companies to reimburce the difference, as they have been charging the expensive SR-22 rates, which were 2x-3x the normal cost of insurance? Isn't this akin to fraud?