• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Statute of limitations

  • Thread starter Thread starter JPG
  • Start date Start date

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

J

JPG

Guest
I am being sued for professional negligence, psychotherapist sexual contact [civil code section 43.93], and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

What is the statute of limitations of these charges? Therapy was terminated October, 1994. She filed a complaint with the licensing board March, 1997, however, the latest that she could allege not thinking she was injured would be in November, 1996.

I am suing her for slander and libel (and I am well within the statute of limitations). Her suit is a cross-complaint, filed in June of this year.

If the statute of limitations is 1 year and 3 years, I do not understand why her attorney allows her to go through the motions of suing. Am I missing something?
 


I AM ALWAYS LIABLE

Senior Member
My response:

You have not stated the month and day of when the alleged injury occurred - only the year, so the SOL cannot be calculated. We would need complete start dates, and the alleged date of the patient's realization that something was wrong, and the filing date of the complaint (cross-complaint).

I presume you have E & O insurance. If that is the case, and if your beliefs concerning the SOL are correct, your attorneys will either file a demurrer, or if for some reason things concerning the SOL are "hazy", then your attorneys will take the patient's deposition and find out the actual dates from the patient.

IAAL

------------------
By reading the “Response” to your question or comment, you agree that: The opinions expressed herein by "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE" are designed to provide educational information only and are not intended to, nor do they, offer legal advice. Opinions expressed to you in this site are not intended to, nor does it, create an attorney-client relationship, nor does it constitute legal advice to any person reviewing such information. No electronic communication with "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE," on its own, will generate an attorney-client relationship, nor will it be considered an attorney-client privileged communication. You further agree that you will obtain your own attorney's advice and counsel for your questions responded to herein by "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE."



[This message has been edited by I AM ALWAYS LIABLE (edited July 01, 2000).]
 
J

JPG

Guest
Last date she can allege injury: 10/12/96
Latest date she can use as date she discovered injury: 3/14/97

My attorney has filed a demurrer. I cannot understand why a reputable attorney would take a case that will be barred by the Statute of Limitations. The above dates are absolute. There is no haziness unless they are suing me under a code which is not covered by the malpractice limitations of actions, or personal injury. I just don’t understand why this action is being filed.
 
L

lars coltrane

Guest
There are many nuances in this area - you have to read the statute and the cases to figure out the limitations period. Also, sometimes a cross-complaint "relates back" to the original filing date in essence extending the statute period. Maybe the cross-complaint is being filed simply in response to your own lawsuit - the best defense is a good offense.

Since you have a lawyer, I suggest that you discuss all these issues with your own lawyer. He/she is in the best position to give you advice.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
Top