A
airbird
Guest
I have one son that turned 19 and I am not required to pay after that according to the decree, but it also was written over 16 years ago and turns out that there is nothing in it to reduce the amount to only one child.( My other daughter). My problem is I have a third child from a different marriage that could really use the money- but I need a real court case number to bring up in court to convince them to lower the payments. As it stands now my one child is 19 but I still have to make support payments as if there were still two kids!! There must be a case somewhere that used this type of situation to convince the courts to amend the decree somewhere. I need help! In Minnesota 1 child is 25% 2 kids is 30% COLA 7% every 2 years compounds up to nearly 80%
over the life of the decree. Yikes my support has nearly doubled since 1985. Up to $1000 a month now. It's killing me. And there is no money left for the youngest child that needs it the most. Typical ex that never spent a dime on the kids over the years but kept it all for herself. Shear greed attack for sure. It is pitiful. 2nd ex was incredible, warm and would do anything for the children. Don't tell me it's all in my head- I can see the difference between them for myself.
Warm or bitter. Some women are different
over the life of the decree. Yikes my support has nearly doubled since 1985. Up to $1000 a month now. It's killing me. And there is no money left for the youngest child that needs it the most. Typical ex that never spent a dime on the kids over the years but kept it all for herself. Shear greed attack for sure. It is pitiful. 2nd ex was incredible, warm and would do anything for the children. Don't tell me it's all in my head- I can see the difference between them for myself.
Warm or bitter. Some women are different