So . . . ? If you will take note you will find that Rule 17 (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is similar as it likewise permits certain representatives including a parent of a minor child "
to sue or defend on behalf of a minor."
However, the federal courts have consistently held that the Rule
"does not confer any right upon such representatives to serve as legal counsel." Citing:
Devine v. Indian River County Sch. Bd., 121 F.3d 576, 581 (11th Cir.1997) (citing Osei–Afriyie v. Medical Coll. of Pennsylvania, 937 F.2d 876, 882–83 (3d Cir.1991); Cheung v. Youth Orchestra Found. of Buffalo, Inc., 906 F.2d 59, 61 (2d Cir.1990); and Meeker v. Kercher, 782 F.2d 153, 154 (10th Cir.1986)); Tindall v. Poultney High Sch. Dist., 414 F.3d 281, 284 (2d Cir.2005)
In consequence this from "
In the Matter of Minor Child "A" by and through F. P. J. her mother vs. Amy Davis, et al. : *
"It is thus a well-established general rule in this Circuit that a parent not admitted to the bar cannot bring an action pro se in federal court on behalf of his or her child." We similarly conclude that Rule 17(c), Ala. R. Civ. P., (similar to that of the FRCP)
does not confer upon a representative of a minor a right to practice law on behalf of that minor.
The purpose for requiring a lawyer is to
"ensure that children rightfully entitled to legal relief are not deprived of their day in court by unskilled, if caring, parents."
Devine v. Indian River County School Board, 121 F.3d 576, 582 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110, 118 S.Ct. 1040, 140 L.Ed.2d 106 (1998).
________________________________
[*]
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/al-court-of-civil-appeals/1588885.html
