My question is split between estate planning and tenancy law in California. I have been a rent paying tenant in a small owner-occupied rental property for more than 20+ years with no written contract. The property was formerly my father's sole property after a divorce from my mother. My father remarried and added his much younger wife to the deed a few years after. A few years ago the ownership of the property was changed and is now currently owned by a family trust with my father and his wife as trustees and myself as a beneficiary.
I have been told by my father that the intent after his passing would be to sell the property with an unspecified percentage share of the proceeds going to me. I am not on good terms with his second wife and I have not been allowed to see the entire trust instrument. I fear my father's wife in the future will try to either indefinitely stall the sale of the property or remove me as quickly as possible for her benefit. As a trust beneficiary, would I have any rights that extend beyond regular tenancy law or would the details of my tenancy and rights have to be spelled out specifically in the trust instrument?
I have been told by my father that the intent after his passing would be to sell the property with an unspecified percentage share of the proceeds going to me. I am not on good terms with his second wife and I have not been allowed to see the entire trust instrument. I fear my father's wife in the future will try to either indefinitely stall the sale of the property or remove me as quickly as possible for her benefit. As a trust beneficiary, would I have any rights that extend beyond regular tenancy law or would the details of my tenancy and rights have to be spelled out specifically in the trust instrument?