• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

The Glass Wall -

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

tctredwell

Junior Member
What is the name of your state? NJ

The music department at the university I attend requires an audition for vocalists before being accepted into the department. The audition is supposed to include sight-reading, sight-singing and piano tests in addition to determining vocal skills. Most of the vocalists accepted into the Bachelor of Arts program as music majors have no chance of succeeding. It's heartbreaking, expensive and has to be illegal. It's fraud. Suing a school or department for this type of fraud may be new but it's way overdue. I was an A-student and lost 2 years of my life, 4 semesters academically and over $11,000 in student loans. I was warned by another vocalist but just wouldn't believe it. How could it happen to me? But it did. And it has happened to many vocalists before me and is still going on. Apparently, the only requirement for getting accepted into the music department as a vocalist is a good voice but the requirement to succeed, and eventually graduate, includes a proficiency in sight-singing, sight-reading and playing the piano that takes a childhood of piano lessons to acquire. But all I ever heard was "you're doing great!" and "just work hard and you'll be fine" but I was already getting A's. What were they talking about? The "glass wall" that's what. I entered my third level of study for music majors and couldn't understand the material in any of my classes. The first assignment for Keyboard III was an 8-part cantata by Bach! I took this homework to a visiting graduate student (a child prodigy!) who laughed and said he'd need at least 20 minutes to figure out the chords before he could help me. He couldn't understand why someone like me, a Level III vocalist, who had only been playing the piano for a year, would be given homework like this. I worked hard for my A's in Keyboard I and Keyboard II but what was this? The same happened in ear-training and sight-reading classes. When I asked for help I was told, "You should know this" but no one had taught me. In Ear-Training I and II and Keyboard I and II, I progressed very well but 2 or 3 semesters couldn't replace years of childhood piano lessons. My parents could afford private voice lessons but not private piano lessons as well. And this is an urban school not a private music conservatory. When I hit this "glass wall" everyone played dumb. The feedback was always the same, "You should have worked harder" and/or "Why didn't you ask for help." I did. Nothing. My choice was either continue taking classes and failing or changing majors. This happened six years ago and it still hurts. I warned some freshmen as I was leaving but they couldn't believe their teachers would let this happen to them. (There must have been something wrong with me.) They were so full of joy and dedication. None of them made it. The worst thing? All these students - no matter what their grades - left thinking it was their fault. So it wasn't just me. It had nothing to do with one's personality, talent or grades. It only has to do with money and prestige. The music department wants the "numbers" (tuition dollars) but will not graduate any vocalist who isn't proficient in piano. There is a name for this requirement - it's called a Piano/Voice or Voice/Piano Major which requires technical proficiency in both - from the start. My school used to have Piano/Voice as a major but now there's only a Voice major. The auditions are just about meaningless BUT in order to graduate the old Piano/Voice requirements are upheld. But no one is told this. So scores (hundreds?) of vocalists have left thinking the failure was theirs. Not so. As one educator told me, "You weren't allowed to succeed." I wrote to the Dean and was shut out. She refused to answer my calls or see me when I stopped by. That went on for six months until I finally gave up. When I had to leave or fail six years ago, I changed majors and had to start all over again. I can only take one class at a time now and I'm still in school. I'm not expected to finish until December '07. The reason I am spurned to action once more is hearing that the "You- Can- Sing- For- Us- And- Give- Us- Your- Money- But- You- Can't- Graduate- With- A- Degree- In- Music" scam is still going on. Apparently this scam is going on all over the place. Wouldn't this case be eligible for a Class Action suit? Thanks for reading, TC.
 


xylene

Senior Member
So Basically

You failed out of music school.

To put it bluntly - so what?

It sounds like you were inexpereienced and didn't read the fine print, or the ciriculum of ALL the class you needed to take.

Attrition happens in any competitive program. That doesn't come close to proving fraud.
 

tctredwell

Junior Member
Response to xylene -

I'm not talking about a music school. This is a state university's music department. And there is no fine print. I guess to put it bluntly - it's fraud - and fraud is a crime because people get hurt. Quick question. Were you ever a voice major? You sound like an ex-voice major trying to be tough or an instrumentalist who doesn't have this problem because instrumentalists are trained to sight-read while singers are trained to learn by ear.
==
You failed out of music school.

To put it bluntly - so what?

It sounds like you were inexpereienced and didn't read the fine print, or the ciriculum of ALL the class you needed to take.

Attrition happens in any competitive program. That doesn't come close to proving fraud.
 

xylene

Senior Member
TC, you failed out of school.

It is not fraud.

It is not fruad that the courses got harder in a way that was not linear.

It is not fraud that the ciriculum is designed to produce attrition (that is some students will fail / or drop out due to difficulty).

That is absolutely the case with nearly all major academic programs.
 

lealea1005

Senior Member
Look, my daughter is an instrumental performance major at a top five music school within a university. She went through the same audition process you did. She studied her instrument for 9 years before auditioning for programs around the country. Although it's not her main instrument, she is also required to pass a piano proficiency and to take vocal lessons.
Yes, it is expensive. Yes, it can be frustrating. Yes, there are disappointments.

Classically trained musicians are a dime a dozen and it's extremely competitive. What kind of research did you do regarding vocal performance majors? What was the strength of their program and how many graduates had employment as a vocal performer? How old is the program? What were the program requirements? Did you speak to graduates of the program before you applied? Did you request a "lesson" with one of the professors before auditioning?

I agree with xylene. You went into a vocal program with what seems to be little experience in theory and piano, both of which are essential for a musician. These programs are designed to "weed out" certain students. If you wanted to go to medical school, but you couldn't pass anatomy, you'd be booted out too.

I really hope you feel better after venting your frustration, but it's time you move on. There's a big world out there and plenty of choices for you.
 
Last edited:

tctredwell

Junior Member
Sorry for delay getting back to you...

Dear LeaLea,
Thank you for your response. Your letter proves my point. Your daughter had 9 years of musical training before auditioning. 9 years of reading music and learning the connections between written notes and their corresponding sounds. When I auditioned, I had a classically trained voice but didn't play an instrument so I couldn't read music. My question is this. Why would a group of Ph.Ds accept me into their major program, teach me for 2 years, watch me blossom as a singer and musician (albeit a beginner musician) and then pull the plug. I had all A's, one B+, and one B-. How could that be failing? How could the faculty continue to audition students and accept students who don't know how to read music? I don't get it. Over 90% of voice majors - accepted as music majors (not music minors) don't get past the 2nd year. How could they? They don't have another instrument. Other schools make it clear for voice majors - they call the major "Voice/Piano" and you must have both skills BEFORE auditioning to even have a chance. It was heartbreaking for me and it's awful to see new students - semester after semester - so happy and confident when I know only one or two will make it to the third year, nevermind, graduate. I feel powerless to help these other students. They are being lied to. There is no fine print. All you need is a good voice and you're in. Then you will be encouraged to work like never before, encouraged to keep trying and keep taking classes over, until you hit the wall. Third-level teachers weed out all voice majors except those who are proficient on piano (regardless of the quality of their voice!). I just don't see how this could be legal. Gotta go. Hope your daughter is doing well, and thanks again for writing to me. TC.

===============

Look, my daughter is an instrumental performance major at a top five music school within a university. She went through the same audition process you did. She studied her instrument for 9 years before auditioning for programs around the country. Although it's not her main instrument, she is also required to pass a piano proficiency and to take vocal lessons.
Yes, it is expensive. Yes, it can be frustrating. Yes, there are disappointments.

Classically trained musicians are a dime a dozen and it's extremely competitive. What kind of research did you do regarding vocal performance majors? What was the strength of their program and how many graduates had employment as a vocal performer? How old is the program? What were the program requirements? Did you speak to graduates of the program before you applied? Did you request a "lesson" with one of the professors before auditioning?

I agree with xylene. You went into a vocal program with what seems to be little experience in theory and piano, both of which are essential for a musician. These programs are designed to "weed out" certain students. If you wanted to go to medical school, but you couldn't pass anatomy, you'd be booted out too.

I really hope you feel better after venting your frustration, but it's time you move on. There's a big world out there and plenty of choices for you.
 

cbg

I'm a Northern Girl
My sister was a brass major, but she was still required to take piano, which is not needed to play the trumpet or trombone, but was nonetheless a requirement of the school.

You didn't read the fine print. You lost. Yes, there was fine print, no matter how you try to claim otherwise.

That is not fraud. That is you failing to investigate the requirements fully.

Stop blaming others for what you did to yourself.
 

CdwJava

Senior Member
I was a music minor (starting in 1980) ... no one told ME that music courses (performance and theory) for declared music minors and majors were one unit LESS than for those who were undeclared. I didn't run away screaming lawsuit. Not only did I have to audition for acceptance, perform, and demonstrate proficiency in new instruments and theory, I also had to suffer with the dropped semester units. Try putting out the same effort in a performance class and getting two units when the guy next to you who is undeclared or has some other major is getting three! Aargh!

Did your situation suck? You bet! Is it fair to expect a vocalist to play the piano? Not to me ... but, then, I'm not a professor and I was not involved in assembling the curriculum. I'll wager that if you did some research beforehand you would have found a list of the required classes, and that a reading of what the classes required (say, Keyboard III as you mentioned, I believe) would have explained this.

Does it suck? Yep. Is it "fraud" such that it gives you a lawful claim against the college or university? I doubt it. Have you consulted any attorneys?

If you are a decent vocalist, I would wager that there are other colleges or programs you could transfer all those units and experience to which will allow you to complete the program with the degree of your choice.

- Carl
 

CdwJava

Senior Member
cbg said:
My sister was a brass major, but she was still required to take piano, which is not needed to play the trumpet or trombone, but was nonetheless a requirement of the school.
Thank God *I* didn't go to her school! I was a brass player, and I never had to learn piano! To this day, I can almost muddle my way through Chopsticks. :D

- Carl
 

cbg

I'm a Northern Girl
She muddled through the class but I don't think she's touched a piano since she graduated in 1986 or so. She plays her trombone every day of her life, however.
 

lealea1005

Senior Member
I do not understand how some one with a "classically trained" voice does not learn how to read music. In your original post you claim sight reading, sight singing and piano was required during the audition process. How'd you get through all of that if you cannot read music??

As I said earlier, every program weeds students out. If it is a requirement of the program, and you cannot meet said requirement, then you are released from the program.

As Carl, cbg, & xylene said earlier.....it sucks, but it isn't fraud.
 

BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
Why would a group of Ph.Ds accept me into their major program, teach me for 2 years, watch me blossom as a singer and musician (albeit a beginner musician) and then pull the plug. I had all A's, one B+, and one B-. How could that be failing? How could the faculty continue to audition students and accept students who don't know how to read music? I don't get it. Over 90% of voice majors - accepted as music majors (not music minors) don't get past the 2nd year. How could they?
Have you NOT seen American Idol?
 

tctredwell

Junior Member
Response to Belize, Lea, Carl, et al.

Thank you for responding to my post. I still don't think we're on the same page. For one, I was 45 years old at the time and had sung in some of the finest chorales in the state (including a gig at Carnegie Hall). Sight reading was always a problem which I compensated for with quick learning and memorization skills. My question remains. Why did professional musicians and educators accept me (and all of my classmates in the voice department) when only 1 (ONE) of us could read music?

In regards to Lea's question - singers learn by ear. They hear a melody and repeat it with their voice. (We usually only need the sheet music for the placement of lyrics.) Instrumentalists learn by sight. After years of practicing seeing a note, finding the note on the instrument, and then hearing the note produced, instrumentalists are much better equipped to sight read and sight sing. Singers, however, don't have that 'see-the-note, play-the-note, hear-the-note' experience that instrumentalists do. A singer can't press a key or valve on their throat to produce a sound.

Also, during my so-called audition I was asked about my sight singing, not tested. I was honest but was told I'd be fine. Just work hard. I did. I got A's. I got standing ovations. Then the third semester I got shut out with impossible work. I didn't fail. I wasn't asked to leave. I couldn't move forward so I changed majors. Why waste my time like that? And the time and money of 95% of the voice majors?

Looking back I didn't have the appropriate training from the very start. The auditioners knew that. They always know that. They are still taking in vocalists who can't read music. Like I said before, less than 5% of the vocalists graduate from the music department. (That's some weeding out process!) The music department accepts approximately 25 new voice majors a year knowing full well only the ones with a background in piano will make it past the 2nd year. That still seems underhanded to me. Why didn't they tell me to hit the road after the audition, or ask me to check out the minor program first? Doesn't the music department have any responsiblity at all? Thank you all for writing, I appreciate it. Theresa.
 

lealea1005

Senior Member
Thank you for responding to my post. I still don't think we're on the same page. For one, I was 45 years old at the time and had sung in some of the finest chorales in the state (including a gig at Carnegie Hall). Sight reading was always a problem which I compensated for with quick learning and memorization skills. My question remains. Why did professional musicians and educators accept me (and all of my classmates in the voice department) when only 1 (ONE) of us could read music?

In regards to Lea's question - singers learn by ear. They hear a melody and repeat it with their voice. (We usually only need the sheet music for the placement of lyrics.) Instrumentalists learn by sight. After years of practicing seeing a note, finding the note on the instrument, and then hearing the note produced, instrumentalists are much better equipped to sight read and sight sing. Singers, however, don't have that 'see-the-note, play-the-note, hear-the-note' experience that instrumentalists do. A singer can't press a key or valve on their throat to produce a sound.

Also, during my so-called audition I was asked about my sight singing, not tested. I was honest but was told I'd be fine. Just work hard. I did. I got A's. I got standing ovations. Then the third semester I got shut out with impossible work. I didn't fail. I wasn't asked to leave. I couldn't move forward so I changed majors. Why waste my time like that? And the time and money of 95% of the voice majors?

Looking back I didn't have the appropriate training from the very start. The auditioners knew that. They always know that. They are still taking in vocalists who can't read music. Like I said before, less than 5% of the vocalists graduate from the music department. (That's some weeding out process!) The music department accepts approximately 25 new voice majors a year knowing full well only the ones with a background in piano will make it past the 2nd year. That still seems underhanded to me. Why didn't they tell me to hit the road after the audition, or ask me to check out the minor program first? Doesn't the music department have any responsiblity at all? Thank you all for writing, I appreciate it. Theresa.

Good luck to you Theresa.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top