Unethical practice?

[justadad-ky]

What is the name of your state? Kentucky

First, I'm not sure if I'm posting in the correct area or not?

Some on here are familer with my case and I will spare the details. However, my question: When do you draw the line on "Unethical practices" by an opposing counsel or is it just a "fact of life?" Is there such a thing?

History, I had a conference call with my attorney pertaining to my ex not wanting to pay her child support as ordered. My attorney has conveyed to me on several occasions that he felt that my ex's attorney was "deleberatly" running up expenses and being unreasonable in the entire process and being unprofessional. My attorney even made a comment as to how the ex's attorney was "out of line" in our initial mediation hearing.

Is there anything I can do about this or just let it roll off my shoulders? I have cooperated in every aspect of the legal process except for the child support issue. I'm just trying to be proactive in my approach.

Thank you in advance.

 

[justadad-ky]

Motion

What is the name of your state? Kentucky

I have googles this question and came up with so much stuff it made my head spin. My ex's attorney is filing a motion under CR60.02. What is this motion and what if anything can I do to prepare?

thank you in advance.

 

[artificially]

CR 60.02 MISTAKE; INADVERTENCE; EXCUSABLE NEGLECT; NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE; FRAUD, ETC.

On motion a court may, upon such terms as are just, relieve a party or his legal representative from its final judgment, order, or proceeding upon the following grounds:

(a) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect;

(b) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59.02; (c) perjury or falsified evidence;

(d) fraud affecting the proceedings, other than perjury or falsified evidence;

(e) the judgment is void, or has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or

(f) any other reason of an extraordinary nature justifying relief.

The motion shall be made within a reasonable time, and on grounds (a), (b), and (c) not more than one year after the judgment, order, or proceeding was entered or taken. A motion under this rule does not affect the finality of a judgment or suspend its operation.

[Amended eff. 1-1-78; prior amendment eff. 6-1-60; adopted eff. 7-1-53]