Seeker2018
Junior Member
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
D1 Driver, hit D2, fault at car accident, had car repaired unrelated to accident, rented car many days after accident, faked injury, fraudulently filed multiple claims for own gain
D1-INS Auto Insurance company for D1, by evidence knowingly paid all the fraudulent claims
D1-COLL Collection attorney, serving as plaintiff for D1-INS
D2 Driver, hit by D1, car insurance expired at that time, paid more than enough out of pocket to cover D1's car, victim of extortion attempt
D2-ATT Attorney for D2, Unable to stop continuous extortion attempt after one thousand dollars paid
This case is about “Never-ending Extortion Attempt” by D2-ATT over a minor auto accident of 12 years ago in which D1 was at fault. No one was injured. But D2 had expired auto insurance at that time and because of this, paid more than ‘enough’ to cover the minor damage. Then D1 filed multiple fraudulent claims (repaired many completely unrelated to the accident, car rental of many days after repair, fake injury). Ignoring its own assessed report, paid them all “knowingly” they were fraudulent, transferred the case to D1-COLL who then filed a civil lawsuit but without making any extra effort to inform of it to D2, despite of knowing D2 physical address (written in police report) , and kept it under his wraps for 9 years. Then finally, one day 9 long years later, D1-COLL had KY department of insurance to suspend D2’s driver license. That was when D2 learned of the lawsuit for the first time. D2 obtained court filing by D1-COLL and learned that there was tens of thousands of dollars against D2, including interest incurred over 9 years on top of payments to claims made by D1. In the filing, D2 verified payments were all “fraudulent,” conducted research in length, retained D2-ATT, provided all evidence possibly obtainable together with verifiable info , and requested to file motion to vacate. The case was vacated 3 years ago under the court of law. D2-ATT said to D2 that insurer would not come back. D2 believed it. Then 1 year ago or within 2 years after the case was vacated, D1-COLL refiled case. {Note: KY law allows plaintiff to file it within 2 years if injury was involved} { No injury in this case} To verify this, D2 contacted medical facilities named in the court filing, info from police report, requested info on nature of visit on record, proved that there was no physical injury, passed it on to D2-ATT.
produce evidence of injury. D2 paid another fee to D2-ATT to respond requesting D1-COLL to produce evidence of injury. D2 waited for 4 months to hear nothing. 7 months after refiling, D1-COLL now wants a deposition. Why it is necessary at this point? Attempt to file a new case?
Why can’t D1-INS swallow monetary loss caused by its own “Stupidity” – they knowingly paid all the fraudulent claims. D2 is not responsible for their stupidity.
D1 Driver, hit D2, fault at car accident, had car repaired unrelated to accident, rented car many days after accident, faked injury, fraudulently filed multiple claims for own gain
D1-INS Auto Insurance company for D1, by evidence knowingly paid all the fraudulent claims
D1-COLL Collection attorney, serving as plaintiff for D1-INS
D2 Driver, hit by D1, car insurance expired at that time, paid more than enough out of pocket to cover D1's car, victim of extortion attempt
D2-ATT Attorney for D2, Unable to stop continuous extortion attempt after one thousand dollars paid
This case is about “Never-ending Extortion Attempt” by D2-ATT over a minor auto accident of 12 years ago in which D1 was at fault. No one was injured. But D2 had expired auto insurance at that time and because of this, paid more than ‘enough’ to cover the minor damage. Then D1 filed multiple fraudulent claims (repaired many completely unrelated to the accident, car rental of many days after repair, fake injury). Ignoring its own assessed report, paid them all “knowingly” they were fraudulent, transferred the case to D1-COLL who then filed a civil lawsuit but without making any extra effort to inform of it to D2, despite of knowing D2 physical address (written in police report) , and kept it under his wraps for 9 years. Then finally, one day 9 long years later, D1-COLL had KY department of insurance to suspend D2’s driver license. That was when D2 learned of the lawsuit for the first time. D2 obtained court filing by D1-COLL and learned that there was tens of thousands of dollars against D2, including interest incurred over 9 years on top of payments to claims made by D1. In the filing, D2 verified payments were all “fraudulent,” conducted research in length, retained D2-ATT, provided all evidence possibly obtainable together with verifiable info , and requested to file motion to vacate. The case was vacated 3 years ago under the court of law. D2-ATT said to D2 that insurer would not come back. D2 believed it. Then 1 year ago or within 2 years after the case was vacated, D1-COLL refiled case. {Note: KY law allows plaintiff to file it within 2 years if injury was involved} { No injury in this case} To verify this, D2 contacted medical facilities named in the court filing, info from police report, requested info on nature of visit on record, proved that there was no physical injury, passed it on to D2-ATT.
produce evidence of injury. D2 paid another fee to D2-ATT to respond requesting D1-COLL to produce evidence of injury. D2 waited for 4 months to hear nothing. 7 months after refiling, D1-COLL now wants a deposition. Why it is necessary at this point? Attempt to file a new case?
Why can’t D1-INS swallow monetary loss caused by its own “Stupidity” – they knowingly paid all the fraudulent claims. D2 is not responsible for their stupidity.
Last edited:
