We don't have any information regarding your grandchildren that live in Oregon.What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California but want information regarding grandchildren that live in Oregon.
your visitation would be based on what your daughter gets. She does not have to agree to restricted visits to California. Unless there is a reason the children should not leave the state, I don't see why a Judge would order it. Your daughter could come to California to visit, or you can still go to Oregon.Sorry, I am new to this.
My daughter was married and had her first child while living in California. Her husband move them to Oregon where they have had a second child. Since they have moved we visit at least twice a year where we must pay for all travel expense, hotels, food (including their food while we are there) and entertainment. When they would come to California we would always need to assist with their travel expenses and they would stay with us and again we would be paying for food and entertainment expenses. Now they are getting divorced and he wants to put verbage into their agreement that will greatly restrict the childrens visits to California. I feel like we are always paying for the right to see our grandchilden and now the when will be effected too, his family is all there so when ever they want to see the kids its no problem he just drops them for overnights whenever they want. It is a 10+ hour drive between us and even three days is tight as two of them are spent traveling. I feel very helpless and am not sure where to go from here.
Sorry, I am new to this.
My daughter was married and had her first child while living in California. Her husband move them to Oregon where they have had a second child. Since they have moved we visit at least twice a year where we must pay for all travel expense, hotels, food (including their food while we are there) and entertainment. When they would come to California we would always need to assist with their travel expenses and they would stay with us and again we would be paying for food and entertainment expenses. Now they are getting divorced and he wants to put verbage into their agreement that will greatly restrict the childrens visits to California. I feel like we are always paying for the right to see our grandchilden and now the when will be effected too, his family is all there so when ever they want to see the kids its no problem he just drops them for overnights whenever they want. It is a 10+ hour drive between us and even three days is tight as two of them are spent traveling. I feel very helpless and am not sure where to go from here.
OK, that's fair.Sorry, I am new to this.
My daughter was married and had her first child while living in California. Her husband move them to Oregon where they have had a second child. Since they have moved we visit at least twice a year where we must pay for all travel expense, hotels, food (including their food while we are there) and entertainment.
It's Dad's right to do that - but as they're not divorced yet it's actually a moot point.When they would come to California we would always need to assist with their travel expenses and they would stay with us and again we would be paying for food and entertainment expenses. Now they are getting divorced and he wants to put verbage into their agreement that will greatly restrict the childrens visits to California.
You don't have any inherent right to see your grandchildren; what is most likely to happen is that you see them when they're with your daughter.I feel like we are always paying for the right to see our grandchilden and now the when will be effected too, his family is all there so when ever they want to see the kids its no problem he just drops them for overnights whenever they want. It is a 10+ hour drive between us and even three days is tight as two of them are spent traveling. I feel very helpless and am not sure where to go from here.