• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Voting question.

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

What is the name of your state? NM
Just received a "Vote for me" card in the mail from an independent candidate running for congress.
On the card it gives a web site with the heading, REGISTER TO WIN $1,000.
Flipping it over it reads; "Due to social distancing my campaign has created a sweep stake for registered voters in NM Congressional District 2. For an opportunity to win, you will need to sign my ballot petition and return the original to the address above"
Could this be construed as a form of bribery?
 


Just one line from his manifesto put me off
"Develop a Labor Department and Labor Union joint effort to create a sponsored residency for undocumented workers and skilled labor visa system"
Any politician who advocates rewarding criminals will never get my vote :(
 

quincy

Senior Member
Okay. So, you do not intend to sign the petition.

You could send a letter to the candidate informing him that he is violating the law with his solicitation or you could send the card you received to the Gaming Board for review.
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
What is the name of your state? NM
Just received a "Vote for me" card in the mail from an independent candidate running for congress.
On the card it gives a web site with the heading, REGISTER TO WIN $1,000.
Flipping it over it reads; "Due to social distancing my campaign has created a sweep stake for registered voters in NM Congressional District 2. For an opportunity to win, you will need to sign my ballot petition and return the original to the address above"
Could this be construed as a form of bribery?
That is an interesting question. I think it would boil down to whether or not the opportunity to possibly win some money in a sweepstakes, could be construed as something of sufficient value to make bribery a legitimate conclusion.
 

quincy

Senior Member
That is an interesting question. I think it would boil down to whether or not the opportunity to possibly win some money in a sweepstakes, could be construed as something of sufficient value to make bribery a legitimate conclusion.
If you read the information from the link, you would learn that what the candidate is doing is illegal. ;) But it is not bribery.

New Mexico Bribery:
https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-24/

https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2019/chapter-30/article-24/section-30-24-2/
 
Last edited:

Taxing Matters

Overtaxed Member
That is an interesting question. I think it would boil down to whether or not the opportunity to possibly win some money in a sweepstakes, could be construed as something of sufficient value to make bribery a legitimate conclusion.
It isn't bribery. NM has 4 bribery crimes. See Chapter 30, Article 24 of the NM statutes. Two relate to bribery of a public official. The first makes it illegal for a person to give something of value to a public official in exchange for the official taking (or not taking) some action in his/her official capacity. The second crime is where the public official solicits such a bribe from a person. The other two are similar but relate to a witness in a legal proceeding rather than a public official. We don't have a public official being paid for some official act or soliciting payment for some official act in this instance.

Federal law has a similar, although slightly more extensive, set of bribery statutes, covering bribery or solicitation of federal government officials, witnesses, financial institution officials, and bribery in sporting contests. See Title 18, Chapter 11 of the U.S. Code. But again, nothing in those bribery statutes covers this.

What we have is a candidate for office (and thus not yet a public official) offering a raffle for people signing his petition to get on the ballot. Moreover the candidate is not getting paid for some official act nor soliciting payment for some official act. He's the one offering something of value, not getting it. So neither element of the crimes is satisfied here — no public official, and no payment to or solicitation by the public official for an offiical act.

As quincy and I both noted, it would appear to violate NM gaming law. It might also violate election law if this raffle would be construed as buying votes. But it is not bribery.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top